Stetson
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,563  Clarissa Consol SO 22:07
1,610  Adrienne DeVita SO 22:10
2,352  Amanda Spring SO 22:57
2,626  Rachel Dumas JR 23:18
2,939  Rachel Frankenberger FR 23:49
2,953  Jessica Cosgrove SO 23:50
3,191  Daniella Moreno SO 24:22
3,241  Trixi Menge SO 24:30
3,525  Emily Nolen SO 25:41
3,711  Connie Compton JR 27:19
3,767  Christine Iselsy JR 28:23
National Rank #270 of 341
South Region Rank #32 of 46
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 33rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Clarissa Consol Adrienne DeVita Amanda Spring Rachel Dumas Rachel Frankenberger Jessica Cosgrove Daniella Moreno Trixi Menge Emily Nolen Connie Compton Christine Iselsy
Embry-Riddle Asics Classic 09/27 1318 22:05 22:27 22:51 23:01 23:51 23:32 24:23 24:32 26:00 27:13 28:20
Flrunners Invitational 15 10/03 1400 22:28 23:02 23:48 23:47 23:56 24:16 25:24 27:36 28:38
FSU Invitational 10/10 1339 21:53 22:02 22:54 23:38 23:44 24:11 24:13 24:35
Atlantic Sun Championships 11/01 1341 22:15 22:11 23:06 23:20 23:54 23:44 25:06 24:30





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 31.5 898 0.1 0.4 7.4 18.3 22.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Clarissa Consol 133.9
Adrienne DeVita 137.6
Amanda Spring 190.1
Rachel Dumas 209.8
Rachel Frankenberger 230.7
Jessica Cosgrove 231.5
Daniella Moreno 251.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 0.4% 0.4 28
29 7.4% 7.4 29
30 18.3% 18.3 30
31 22.2% 22.2 31
32 24.7% 24.7 32
33 25.2% 25.2 33
34 1.6% 1.6 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0