Texas Tech
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
223  Jocelyn Caro SO 20:27
253  Sharlene Nickle SR 20:32
912  Jasmine Torres FR 21:27
1,220  Madeline Livergood SR 21:47
1,367  Erica Brown FR 21:56
2,023  Macy Schulte SO 22:35
2,165  Kelly McQuaid JR 22:44
2,340  Katy Allen JR 22:56
2,404  Maggy Mulholland SO 23:00
2,741  Sophia Jimenez JR 23:30
2,784  Sarah Bailey SO 23:34
National Rank #94 of 341
Mountain Region Rank #9 of 20
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 11th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 28.6%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jocelyn Caro Sharlene Nickle Jasmine Torres Madeline Livergood Erica Brown Macy Schulte Kelly McQuaid Katy Allen Maggy Mulholland Sophia Jimenez Sarah Bailey
Chile Pepper Festival 10/04 1058 20:33 20:31 21:54 21:43 21:43 22:09 22:43 22:58 22:55 23:29
ISU Pre-National Invitational (White) 10/18 965 20:17 20:17 21:15 21:57 21:43 22:36
Big 12 Championship 11/01 1067 20:50 20:25 21:28 21:37 22:01 22:44 22:41 22:54 23:06 23:34
Mountain Region Championships 11/14 1078 20:13 21:18 21:16 21:56 22:34 22:50 23:08





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 11.8 336 0.0 0.2 0.9 3.7 9.1 14.7 18.5 17.5 13.5 9.5 5.9 3.8 1.9 0.7 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jocelyn Caro 16.2% 138.0
Sharlene Nickle 9.6% 144.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jocelyn Caro 22.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.9 3.4 3.5 3.7 4.1 3.6 4.3 4.2 4.7 4.6 4.3 4.2 3.6
Sharlene Nickle 25.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.9 3.6 3.4 3.7 4.0 3.5 4.4 3.6 4.4
Jasmine Torres 77.6 0.0
Madeline Livergood 99.4
Erica Brown 108.2
Macy Schulte 126.3
Kelly McQuaid 127.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.0% 0.0 5
6 0.2% 0.2 6
7 0.9% 0.9 7
8 3.7% 3.7 8
9 9.1% 9.1 9
10 14.7% 14.7 10
11 18.5% 18.5 11
12 17.5% 17.5 12
13 13.5% 13.5 13
14 9.5% 9.5 14
15 5.9% 5.9 15
16 3.8% 3.8 16
17 1.9% 1.9 17
18 0.7% 0.7 18
19 0.0% 0.0 19
20 20
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0