UMBC
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
404  Sarah Daly JR 20:48
733  Sophia Cologer SO 21:14
1,089  Katie Govatos SO 21:39
1,415  Nicole Dawson JR 21:59
1,668  Mary Katherine Kulp JR 22:13
1,694  Julie Gessler SR 22:14
1,953  Angelina Oputa JR 22:31
1,983  Katelyn Callaghan SO 22:33
2,146  Harmony Roche JR 22:43
2,227  Chelsea Vane SO 22:49
2,734  Olivia Richter FR 23:29
3,103  Cindy Alms SO 24:09
3,429  Essence Fredericks JR 25:11
National Rank #150 of 341
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #15 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 14th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 14.1%
Top 20 in Regional 99.9%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Sarah Daly Sophia Cologer Katie Govatos Nicole Dawson Mary Katherine Kulp Julie Gessler Angelina Oputa Katelyn Callaghan Harmony Roche Chelsea Vane Olivia Richter
Lehigh Paul Short Run (Gold) 10/04 1179 20:48 21:27 21:47 21:56 22:13 22:18 22:24 22:26 22:54 23:14
Princeton Invitational 10/18 1178 20:50 21:19 21:45 21:54 22:30 22:37 22:38 22:36 23:23
American East Championships 11/01 1224 21:08 21:38 22:01 22:21 22:19 22:26 22:50 22:54 23:55
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/14 1254 21:36 21:53 22:16 22:22 23:13 22:44 22:39





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 13.2 424 0.0 0.3 1.8 4.2 7.7 10.9 13.4 14.6 15.8 14.0 8.6 4.7 2.3 0.9 0.4 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sarah Daly 1.9% 179.1


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sarah Daly 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.5
Sophia Cologer 61.4 0.0 0.1 0.0
Katie Govatos 87.4
Nicole Dawson 111.5
Mary Katherine Kulp 132.1
Julie Gessler 134.0
Angelina Oputa 154.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 0.0% 0.0 6
7 0.3% 0.3 7
8 1.8% 1.8 8
9 4.2% 4.2 9
10 7.7% 7.7 10
11 10.9% 10.9 11
12 13.4% 13.4 12
13 14.6% 14.6 13
14 15.8% 15.8 14
15 14.0% 14.0 15
16 8.6% 8.6 16
17 4.7% 4.7 17
18 2.3% 2.3 18
19 0.9% 0.9 19
20 0.4% 0.4 20
21 0.1% 0.1 21
22 0.0% 0.0 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0