Vermont
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
734  Alicia Clark JR 21:15
877  Nikki Braceras JR 21:25
1,191  Hilary Rawding JR 21:45
1,519  Julie Richer SO 22:05
1,591  Amber Peirsol JR 22:08
2,061  Sydney Durand SR 22:38
2,181  Smita Boesch-Dining FR 22:45
2,363  Denali Balser SO 22:58
2,368  Heidi Peterson JR 22:58
2,611  Natalie Tocco SO 23:17
2,630  Colleen Yancey FR 23:19
2,724  Emily Horgan FR 23:28
2,857  Laura Dissly FR 23:42
2,914  Margaret Gish FR 23:47
3,116  Emily Feng SO 24:10
3,584  Emma Greenawalt FR 26:03
3,610  Megan Pierce FR 26:16
3,631  Heather Scott FR 26:26
National Rank #184 of 341
Northeast Region Rank #23 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 23rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 39.6%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Alicia Clark Nikki Braceras Hilary Rawding Julie Richer Amber Peirsol Sydney Durand Smita Boesch-Dining Denali Balser Heidi Peterson Natalie Tocco Colleen Yancey
NWICAAA Championship 10/11 1228 21:36 21:38 21:46 21:47 21:54 23:03 22:36
Brown University 10/17 1232 21:16 22:14 21:41 22:12 22:01 22:35 22:47 22:40 22:45 23:17 22:58
American East Championships 11/01 1188 20:58 21:12 21:45 21:55 22:30 22:25 22:47 23:21 23:13 23:42
Northeast Region Championships 11/14 1193 21:09 20:58 21:55 22:27 22:18 22:39 23:20





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 21.2 641 0.0 0.1 1.3 4.4 6.5 7.8 9.0 10.5 11.9 13.1 13.4 9.6 6.8 3.9 1.4 0.3 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Alicia Clark 88.1 0.0
Nikki Braceras 104.6
Hilary Rawding 131.3
Julie Richer 155.8
Amber Peirsol 160.2
Sydney Durand 197.9
Smita Boesch-Dining 205.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 0.0% 0.0 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 1.3% 1.3 15
16 4.4% 4.4 16
17 6.5% 6.5 17
18 7.8% 7.8 18
19 9.0% 9.0 19
20 10.5% 10.5 20
21 11.9% 11.9 21
22 13.1% 13.1 22
23 13.4% 13.4 23
24 9.6% 9.6 24
25 6.8% 6.8 25
26 3.9% 3.9 26
27 1.4% 1.4 27
28 0.3% 0.3 28
29 0.0% 0.0 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0