Bryant
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
892  Martha Reynolds SR 21:26
1,113  Annmarie Tuxbury JR 21:40
2,057  Kara Walsh SR 22:38
2,401  Elizabeth Wilmonton FR 23:00
2,530  Staci Rezendes JR 23:10
2,573  Brooke Tomasetti SR 23:14
2,628  Sarah Lapham FR 23:18
2,761  Erin Svensen JR 23:31
2,891  Brittany Sarza JR 23:45
2,962  Emily McNeil SO 23:51
National Rank #241 of 341
Northeast Region Rank #31 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 28th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Martha Reynolds Annmarie Tuxbury Kara Walsh Elizabeth Wilmonton Staci Rezendes Brooke Tomasetti Sarah Lapham Erin Svensen Brittany Sarza Emily McNeil
CCSU Ted Owen Invitational 09/27 1207 20:48 21:12 22:42 23:40 23:02 23:09 22:44 23:36
NWICAAA Championship 10/11 1259 21:03 21:37 22:49 23:11 23:07 22:54 23:57
Brown University 10/17 1309 21:53 22:37 23:01 22:34 23:39 23:31 24:25 23:42
CCSU Mini Meet 10/24 1315 21:43 22:27 22:48 23:21 23:19 23:33 24:02
Northeast Conference Championship 11/01 1256 21:23 21:38 22:13 22:12 23:09 23:10 23:27 23:35 23:22 23:50
Northeast Region Championships 11/14 1332 22:04 22:09 23:04 23:22 23:40 23:29 23:47





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 29.1 870 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.6 4.8 12.7 22.9 20.9 15.6 9.3



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Martha Reynolds 106.7
Annmarie Tuxbury 125.5
Kara Walsh 197.9
Elizabeth Wilmonton 220.2
Staci Rezendes 228.4
Brooke Tomasetti 230.9
Sarah Lapham 234.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 0.0% 0.0 21
22 0.1% 0.1 22
23 0.1% 0.1 23
24 0.4% 0.4 24
25 1.6% 1.6 25
26 4.8% 4.8 26
27 12.7% 12.7 27
28 22.9% 22.9 28
29 20.9% 20.9 29
30 15.6% 15.6 30
31 9.3% 9.3 31
32 6.0% 6.0 32
33 3.1% 3.1 33
34 1.5% 1.5 34
35 0.8% 0.8 35
36 0.2% 0.2 36
37 0.1% 0.1 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0