Eastern Washington
Men
-
Women
2013
-
2014 -
2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
106 |
Sarah Reiter |
SO |
20:05 |
351 |
Berenice Penaloza |
JR |
20:42 |
562 |
Katie Mahoney |
JR |
21:02 |
888 |
Paula Gil Echevarria |
SO |
21:26 |
1,689 |
Mayra Chavez |
JR |
22:14 |
2,066 |
Emily Hazen |
JR |
22:38 |
2,206 |
Katie Lynch |
SO |
22:47 |
|
National Rank |
#75 of 341 |
West Region Rank |
#14 of 39 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
0.0% |
Most Likely Finish |
15th at Regional |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
0.6% |
Top 20 in Regional |
97.6% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Sarah Reiter |
Berenice Penaloza |
Katie Mahoney |
Paula Gil Echevarria |
Mayra Chavez |
Emily Hazen |
Katie Lynch |
ISU Pre-National Invitational (White) |
10/18 |
988 |
20:12 |
20:43 |
20:58 |
21:26 |
22:16 |
22:57 |
|
Big Sky Conference Championships |
11/01 |
978 |
20:06 |
20:41 |
21:04 |
21:25 |
22:13 |
22:25 |
22:47 |
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
15.9 |
472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
1.2 |
2.6 |
6.8 |
13.0 |
21.3 |
20.0 |
14.4 |
8.8 |
5.6 |
3.3 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Sarah Reiter |
19.6% |
75.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.2 |
0.0 |
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Sarah Reiter |
19.5 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
2.8 |
3.0 |
3.9 |
3.5 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
3.6 |
4.6 |
3.6 |
4.0 |
3.8 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
Berenice Penaloza |
57.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
Katie Mahoney |
83.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
Paula Gil Echevarria |
119.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mayra Chavez |
188.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emily Hazen |
213.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Katie Lynch |
221.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
0.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
1.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
2.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
6.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
13.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
21.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
20.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
14.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
8.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
5.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
3.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
22 |
23 |
0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
23 |
24 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
24 |
25 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |