Nebraska
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
248  Anna Peer SO 20:31
1,146  Bonnie Smith FR 21:42
1,557  Grace Geiger FR 22:07
1,665  Shawnice Williams SR 22:13
1,773  Megan Lush JR 22:20
2,021  Kristi Oslund SO 22:35
2,134  Katrina Santiago FR 22:42
2,158  Haley Harsin FR 22:43
2,482  Elizabeth Carpino FR 23:07
3,369  Kendall Cast FR 24:55
National Rank #144 of 341
Midwest Region Rank #20 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 28th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 5.6%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Anna Peer Bonnie Smith Grace Geiger Shawnice Williams Megan Lush Kristi Oslund Katrina Santiago Haley Harsin Elizabeth Carpino Kendall Cast
Roy Griak Invitational 09/27 1098 20:06 22:18 22:10 21:58 22:34 23:01 23:25 24:12
Bradley Pink Classic 10/17 1207 20:56 21:36 21:54 22:25 22:29 23:33 22:37 23:02 25:30
Big Ten Conference Championships 11/02 1077 20:02 21:37 22:07 22:06 22:29 22:48 22:25 22:19 23:03
Midwest Region Championships 11/14 1222 21:03 21:39 22:18 22:22 22:23 22:31 23:02





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 25.5 657 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.0 1.6 2.5 4.3 5.4 8.0 9.6 10.6 12.7 15.0 15.5 11.9 1.3 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Anna Peer 0.8% 124.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Anna Peer 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.6 1.6 2.2 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.8 3.6 3.6 3.9 3.4 3.3 3.4
Bonnie Smith 125.6
Grace Geiger 160.9
Shawnice Williams 169.4
Megan Lush 178.7
Kristi Oslund 196.1
Katrina Santiago 202.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 0.3% 0.3 17
18 1.0% 1.0 18
19 1.6% 1.6 19
20 2.5% 2.5 20
21 4.3% 4.3 21
22 5.4% 5.4 22
23 8.0% 8.0 23
24 9.6% 9.6 24
25 10.6% 10.6 25
26 12.7% 12.7 26
27 15.0% 15.0 27
28 15.5% 15.5 28
29 11.9% 11.9 29
30 1.3% 1.3 30
31 0.1% 0.1 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0