Southern Miss.
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
777  Rebecca Ulrich JR 21:18
963  Daphney Stanford SO 21:31
1,184  Kristin Zarrella SO 21:45
1,603  Alondra Hoyos FR 22:09
1,706  Dana Dillistone SO 22:15
2,002  Katie Canavin JR 22:34
National Rank #192 of 341
South Region Rank #23 of 46
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 19th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.1%
Top 20 in Regional 72.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Rebecca Ulrich Daphney Stanford Kristin Zarrella Alondra Hoyos Dana Dillistone Katie Canavin
North Texas Ken Garland Invitational 09/27 1225 21:12 21:30 21:41 22:21 22:50 22:40
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/17 1211 21:17 21:20 21:34 21:52 22:17 22:43
Conference USA Championships 11/01 1236 21:24 21:44 21:52 22:12 22:22 22:34
South Region Championships 11/14 1220 21:17 21:29 21:50 22:10 21:48 22:19





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 18.5 544 0.1 0.3 2.3 4.1 5.5 7.6 8.7 10.4 11.5 11.5 10.1 8.3 7.2 4.7 3.7 2.1 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rebecca Ulrich 69.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Daphney Stanford 87.8 0.0
Kristin Zarrella 106.8
Alondra Hoyos 136.5
Dana Dillistone 143.1
Katie Canavin 164.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 0.1% 0.1 10
11 0.3% 0.3 11
12 2.3% 2.3 12
13 4.1% 4.1 13
14 5.5% 5.5 14
15 7.6% 7.6 15
16 8.7% 8.7 16
17 10.4% 10.4 17
18 11.5% 11.5 18
19 11.5% 11.5 19
20 10.1% 10.1 20
21 8.3% 8.3 21
22 7.2% 7.2 22
23 4.7% 4.7 23
24 3.7% 3.7 24
25 2.1% 2.1 25
26 1.2% 1.2 26
27 0.6% 0.6 27
28 0.2% 0.2 28
29 0.0% 0.0 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0