Binghamton
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,254  Allison Davis JR 21:47
1,826  Jessica Cueva-Scarpelli FR 22:23
1,841  Alana MacDonald SR 22:24
1,929  Erika Yamazaki SO 22:29
2,130  Chelsea Ogindo FR 22:42
2,280  Eileen O'Hara SR 22:53
2,290  Michelle Crook JR 22:54
2,636  Jessica Thatcher SO 23:24
2,909  Amanda Kobiolka JR 23:58
National Rank #230 of 344
Northeast Region Rank #31 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 32nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Allison Davis Jessica Cueva-Scarpelli Alana MacDonald Erika Yamazaki Chelsea Ogindo Eileen O'Hara Michelle Crook Jessica Thatcher Amanda Kobiolka
Binghamton Meet 09/17 1282 22:03 22:19 22:28 22:53 22:50 22:52 22:55 23:57
Paul Short Invitational (Brown) 10/01 1259 21:48 22:33 22:27 22:20 22:31 22:27 23:00 23:39 24:14
UAlbany Invitational 10/15 1261 22:03 22:27 22:20 22:13 22:31 23:09 22:50 24:02 23:49
America East Championship 10/29 1253 21:44 22:16 22:02 22:23 23:11 22:07 23:18 23:46
Northeast Region Championships 11/11 1263 21:28 22:18 22:34 22:16 22:56 22:52 23:33





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 31.1 914 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.5 2.1 2.8 4.8 8.6 12.4 19.7



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Allison Davis 129.9
Jessica Cueva-Scarpelli 189.2
Alana MacDonald 190.4
Erika Yamazaki 198.2
Chelsea Ogindo 215.0
Eileen O'Hara 228.6
Michelle Crook 229.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 0.1% 0.1 21
22 0.1% 0.1 22
23 0.2% 0.2 23
24 0.7% 0.7 24
25 1.5% 1.5 25
26 2.1% 2.1 26
27 2.8% 2.8 27
28 4.8% 4.8 28
29 8.6% 8.6 29
30 12.4% 12.4 30
31 19.7% 19.7 31
32 22.1% 22.1 32
33 13.0% 13.0 33
34 7.8% 7.8 34
35 3.3% 3.3 35
36 1.1% 1.1 36
37 0.3% 0.3 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0