Miami
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
543  Gabrielle Hesslau SR 21:00
1,704  Anne Den Otter SO 22:15
2,559  Mulloy Manning JR 23:15
2,603  Carla Rodriguez SO 23:20
2,808  Sarah Raboff SO 23:44
3,415  Megan Brown SR 26:16
National Rank #259 of 344
South Region Rank #31 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 31st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Gabrielle Hesslau Anne Den Otter Mulloy Manning Carla Rodriguez Sarah Raboff Megan Brown
Mountains to Sea Duals 09/16 1402 21:17 22:30 23:34 22:56 26:18
Gator Cross Country Invitational 09/24 1364 21:08 22:05 23:28 24:44 23:41 25:30
USF Invitational 10/14 1302 20:37 23:11 22:37 23:25 24:50 26:13
ACC Championships 10/28 1307 21:10 22:19 23:41 22:45 23:23 26:48
South Region Championships 11/11 1268 20:51 21:58 22:57 23:00 23:38





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 31.0 877 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.7 3.1 7.9 20.3 27.9



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Gabrielle Hesslau 53.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.5
Anne Den Otter 143.0
Mulloy Manning 218.9
Carla Rodriguez 222.5
Sarah Raboff 239.4
Megan Brown 286.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 0.1% 0.1 24
25 0.2% 0.2 25
26 0.7% 0.7 26
27 1.7% 1.7 27
28 3.1% 3.1 28
29 7.9% 7.9 29
30 20.3% 20.3 30
31 27.9% 27.9 31
32 26.4% 26.4 32
33 9.2% 9.2 33
34 2.2% 2.2 34
35 0.5% 0.5 35
36 0.1% 0.1 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0