Nebraska-Omaha
Men
-
Women
2015
-
2016 -
2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
1,293 |
Willa Koenig |
FR |
21:50 |
1,464 |
Renata Valquier-Chavez |
FR |
22:00 |
1,636 |
Kayla Sabotin |
SO |
22:11 |
2,297 |
Alyssa Averhoff |
JR |
22:54 |
2,316 |
Rosie Gensichen |
SO |
22:55 |
2,437 |
Anita Jenkins |
FR |
23:04 |
2,743 |
Sarah Steffensmeier |
FR |
23:35 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
0.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Willa Koenig |
Renata Valquier-Chavez |
Kayla Sabotin |
Alyssa Averhoff |
Rosie Gensichen |
Anita Jenkins |
Sarah Steffensmeier |
Woody Greeno/Jay Kirksen Invitational |
09/17 |
1265 |
21:33 |
22:12 |
22:12 |
22:44 |
22:58 |
22:46 |
22:57 |
Roy Griak Invitational |
09/24 |
1279 |
22:03 |
21:51 |
22:29 |
23:17 |
22:46 |
23:01 |
23:51 |
Midwest Regional Preview |
10/01 |
1270 |
21:50 |
21:50 |
22:07 |
22:38 |
23:05 |
23:07 |
23:00 |
Summit League Championship |
10/29 |
1315 |
21:42 |
23:35 |
21:59 |
23:55 |
23:04 |
22:54 |
24:21 |
Midwest Region Championships |
11/11 |
1259 |
21:59 |
21:37 |
22:09 |
22:36 |
22:44 |
23:43 |
23:54 |
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
29.8 |
869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.8 |
3.9 |
9.8 |
13.8 |
16.9 |
17.7 |
14.7 |
NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Willa Koenig |
135.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renata Valquier-Chavez |
150.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kayla Sabotin |
164.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alyssa Averhoff |
211.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rosie Gensichen |
212.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anita Jenkins |
219.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah Steffensmeier |
235.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
10 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
12 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
13 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
23 |
24 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
24 |
25 |
0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
25 |
26 |
3.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
26 |
27 |
9.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
27 |
28 |
13.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
28 |
29 |
16.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
29 |
30 |
17.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
30 |
31 |
14.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
31 |
32 |
12.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
32 |
33 |
6.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
33 |
34 |
2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
34 |
35 |
1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |