Nebraska
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
548  Anna Peer JR 21:01
773  Katrina Santiago JR 21:17
962  Bonnie Smith JR 21:29
1,325  Nicole Colonna SO 21:52
1,648  Elsa Forsberg FR 22:12
1,746  Rachel Brush FR 22:17
1,846  Judi Jones FR 22:24
1,864  Elizabeth Kirby SR 22:25
1,889  Kendall Cast JR 22:27
2,347  Kristi Oslund SR 22:57
National Rank #160 of 344
Midwest Region Rank #22 of 37
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 20th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.5%
Top 20 in Regional 52.1%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Anna Peer Katrina Santiago Bonnie Smith Nicole Colonna Elsa Forsberg Rachel Brush Judi Jones Elizabeth Kirby Kendall Cast Kristi Oslund
Woody Greeno/Jay Kirksen Invitational 09/17 1209 21:35 21:25 21:52 22:19 21:55 22:26 22:37 23:16 23:14
Joe Piane Invitational (Blue) 09/30 1208 21:25 21:13 21:27 21:57 22:27 22:20 22:20
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (Open) 10/15 21:58 22:07 22:46
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (White) 10/15 1211 21:18 21:20 21:35 22:20 22:09 22:02
Big 10 Championship 10/30 1167 20:51 21:09 21:49 21:50 21:48 22:59 22:53 22:40 22:32
Midwest Region Championships 11/11 1133 20:35 21:10 21:37 21:49 22:03 22:26 22:11





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 20.0 543 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.4 1.6 2.5 3.7 5.0 6.0 8.4 10.0 12.6 12.5 11.6 11.4 7.2 4.2 1.1 0.1 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Anna Peer 58.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Katrina Santiago 82.5 0.1 0.1
Bonnie Smith 103.3
Nicole Colonna 137.5
Elsa Forsberg 164.9
Rachel Brush 172.3
Judi Jones 181.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 0.3% 0.3 9
10 0.3% 0.3 10
11 0.6% 0.6 11
12 1.4% 1.4 12
13 1.6% 1.6 13
14 2.5% 2.5 14
15 3.7% 3.7 15
16 5.0% 5.0 16
17 6.0% 6.0 17
18 8.4% 8.4 18
19 10.0% 10.0 19
20 12.6% 12.6 20
21 12.5% 12.5 21
22 11.6% 11.6 22
23 11.4% 11.4 23
24 7.2% 7.2 24
25 4.2% 4.2 25
26 1.1% 1.1 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 0.1% 0.1 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0