Tennessee Tech
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
517  Micayla Rennick JR 20:58
1,368  Sarah Brandt SR 21:54
1,550  Purity Murray SR 22:06
1,732  Jenna Storms SO 22:17
2,622  Madison Stremler SO 23:22
3,085  Anna Cooper JR 24:29
3,371  Andrea Retano SO 25:52
3,393  D'Airrien Jackson SO 26:00
National Rank #206 of 344
South Region Rank #25 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 23rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 5.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Micayla Rennick Sarah Brandt Purity Murray Jenna Storms Madison Stremler Anna Cooper Andrea Retano D'Airrien Jackson
Commadore Classic 09/17 1312 21:28 22:02 22:33 22:35 24:34 25:49 26:19
Louisville Classic (Blue) 10/01 1273 21:06 21:45 22:04 22:53 23:46 24:28 25:28 24:37
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/14 1176 20:40 21:13 21:57 22:04 23:13 24:23 27:45
Ohio Valley Championship 10/29 1229 20:51 22:10 22:01 21:59 23:21 24:29 26:26 25:29
South Region Championships 11/11 1225 20:54 22:05 22:11 22:15 22:58





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 23.8 672 0.3 0.2 1.3 3.2 8.2 18.0 18.6 16.0 12.8 8.6 5.9 3.6 2.4 0.8 0.5



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Micayla Rennick 49.8 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6
Sarah Brandt 117.3
Purity Murray 131.0
Jenna Storms 145.3
Madison Stremler 224.2
Anna Cooper 262.3
Andrea Retano 281.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 0.3% 0.3 17
18 0.2% 0.2 18
19 1.3% 1.3 19
20 3.2% 3.2 20
21 8.2% 8.2 21
22 18.0% 18.0 22
23 18.6% 18.6 23
24 16.0% 16.0 24
25 12.8% 12.8 25
26 8.6% 8.6 26
27 5.9% 5.9 27
28 3.6% 3.6 28
29 2.4% 2.4 29
30 0.8% 0.8 30
31 0.5% 0.5 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0