Tennessee-Martin
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
212  Ann Asipan 20:20
1,202  Kara Martin FR 21:44
1,209  Emma Edmonds FR 21:45
1,437  Amelia Martin JR 21:59
1,455  Nelly Kandie SO 22:00
1,675  Cherie Wilson SO 22:13
2,049  Chantal Wilson SO 22:36
2,509  Natalie Motor FR 23:10
2,666  Kiana Hope JR 23:27
National Rank #119 of 344
South Region Rank #14 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 17th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 1.2%
Top 20 in Regional 94.9%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Ann Asipan Kara Martin Emma Edmonds Amelia Martin Nelly Kandie Cherie Wilson Chantal Wilson Natalie Motor Kiana Hope
Commadore Classic 09/17 1178 20:41 21:40 22:40 22:10 22:49 22:00 22:36 23:17
Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/01 1136 20:26 22:04 21:42 22:05 21:45 22:22 22:52 23:16 23:11
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/14 1062 20:08 21:32 21:19 21:40 21:56 22:26 22:52
Ohio Valley Championship 10/29 1115 20:20 21:39 21:53 21:51 21:51 22:13 22:41 23:45
South Region Championships 11/11 1117 20:22 21:50 21:31 21:48 22:03 22:19 23:14





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 16.7 479 0.1 0.3 0.9 1.5 3.1 4.3 7.4 12.6 14.5 16.2 14.1 11.5 8.8 3.9 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Ann Asipan 4.5% 116.3


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Ann Asipan 17.9 0.2 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.9 1.9 3.2 2.6 3.5 3.9 4.1 3.7 4.0 4.6 4.6 4.4 4.6 4.1 3.6 3.8 2.9 2.7 4.6 3.4
Kara Martin 107.1
Emma Edmonds 107.2
Amelia Martin 123.5
Nelly Kandie 124.5
Cherie Wilson 140.7
Chantal Wilson 173.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 0.1% 0.1 8
9 0.3% 0.3 9
10 0.9% 0.9 10
11 1.5% 1.5 11
12 3.1% 3.1 12
13 4.3% 4.3 13
14 7.4% 7.4 14
15 12.6% 12.6 15
16 14.5% 14.5 16
17 16.2% 16.2 17
18 14.1% 14.1 18
19 11.5% 11.5 19
20 8.8% 8.8 20
21 3.9% 3.9 21
22 0.9% 0.9 22
23 0.2% 0.2 23
24 0.1% 0.1 24
25 25
26 0.1% 0.1 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0