UMKC
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
775  Chandler Carreon JR 21:17
1,646  Kelly Carpenter SR 22:12
1,835  Gabrielle Penaflor SR 22:23
1,933  Elizabeth Nolke JR 22:29
2,330  Sarah Jaloma FR 22:56
2,452  Tabitha Griffith SO 23:05
2,752  Megan Mills JR 23:37
2,953  Katie Tuck SR 24:07
National Rank #223 of 344
Midwest Region Rank #27 of 37
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 27th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Chandler Carreon Kelly Carpenter Gabrielle Penaflor Elizabeth Nolke Sarah Jaloma Tabitha Griffith Megan Mills Katie Tuck
Roy Griak Invitational 09/24 1307 21:15 22:17 22:31 22:56 24:12
Rim Rock Classic 10/01 23:10 22:45 24:22 23:39
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (White) 10/15 1265 21:22 22:04 22:38 22:17 23:03 23:29 24:12
WAC Championship 10/29 1251 21:27 22:19 22:18 22:07 22:35 23:23 23:08 24:34
Midwest Region Championships 11/11 1262 21:12 22:14 22:08 22:11 23:19 23:27 23:21





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 28.5 826 0.1 0.1 0.8 3.2 11.3 21.6 18.3 15.9 12.2 8.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Chandler Carreon 83.3 0.1 0.1
Kelly Carpenter 165.4
Gabrielle Penaflor 180.6
Elizabeth Nolke 187.4
Sarah Jaloma 213.8
Tabitha Griffith 221.4
Megan Mills 236.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 0.1% 0.1 22
23 0.1% 0.1 23
24 0.8% 0.8 24
25 3.2% 3.2 25
26 11.3% 11.3 26
27 21.6% 21.6 27
28 18.3% 18.3 28
29 15.9% 15.9 29
30 12.2% 12.2 30
31 8.2% 8.2 31
32 4.9% 4.9 32
33 2.9% 2.9 33
34 0.6% 0.6 34
35 0.2% 0.2 35
36 36
37 37
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0