UNC-Asheville
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,707  Sarah Heisner SR 22:15
2,111  Kelly Coleman SO 22:41
2,438  Amy Castle SR 23:04
2,679  Phoebe Schneider JR 23:29
2,710  Marissa Banks SR 23:32
2,908  Lana Reeves SO 23:58
3,080  Megan Brewer SO 24:28
3,088  Abby Reimer FR 24:29
3,252  Maddie Lowe JR 25:07
3,258  Katie Gamble SR 25:10
National Rank #273 of 344
Southeast Region Rank #35 of 50
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 36th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Sarah Heisner Kelly Coleman Amy Castle Phoebe Schneider Marissa Banks Lana Reeves Megan Brewer Abby Reimer Maddie Lowe Katie Gamble
UNC-Asheville Invitational 09/10 1341 22:09 22:36 23:05 23:55 23:02 24:07 24:57 23:58 24:25
Asheville Challenge 10/01 1372 21:57 22:36 23:27 23:32 24:14 24:32 24:23 24:50
High Point Vert Invitational 10/14 1355 22:51 22:57 23:04 23:18 23:26 24:00 25:17 25:36 25:26 26:18
Big South Championships 10/28 1327 22:51 22:37 22:52 23:04 24:27 23:17 24:00 24:48 25:30





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 35.7 1099 0.1 0.3 0.6



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sarah Heisner 170.7
Kelly Coleman 202.3
Amy Castle 227.3
Phoebe Schneider 249.0
Marissa Banks 252.1
Lana Reeves 271.4
Megan Brewer 289.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 0.1% 0.1 28
29 29
30 0.3% 0.3 30
31 0.6% 0.6 31
32 1.8% 1.8 32
33 4.8% 4.8 33
34 8.6% 8.6 34
35 19.4% 19.4 35
36 39.5% 39.5 36
37 18.1% 18.1 37
38 4.5% 4.5 38
39 1.9% 1.9 39
40 0.7% 0.7 40
41 0.1% 0.1 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0