UNLV
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
803  Spencer Moore JR 21:18
1,596  Angela Ziff JR 22:08
1,747  Sara Williams SR 22:18
2,405  Kennedy Allen FR 23:01
2,496  Caitlin Amburgey FR 23:09
2,712  Nicole Snow FR 23:33
2,853  Lindy Eskin JR 23:51
3,270  Yamilet Biggers FR 25:14
National Rank #240 of 344
West Region Rank #33 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 33rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Spencer Moore Angela Ziff Sara Williams Kennedy Allen Caitlin Amburgey Nicole Snow Lindy Eskin Yamilet Biggers
UC Riverside Invitational 09/17 1272 21:26 22:16 22:09 22:20 23:35 23:19 23:57
UNLV vs. SDSU 09/23 1258 21:36 22:18 22:28 22:37 22:31 23:14 23:40
Santa Clara Bronco Invitational 10/15 1252 21:07 21:53 22:18 23:05 22:41 23:57 23:13 25:14
Mountain West Championship 10/28 1340 21:22 22:14 22:45 24:19 24:26 23:35
West Region Championships 11/11 1294 21:05 22:01 22:19 22:54 24:17





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 32.1 925 0.1 0.4 1.5 3.1 9.8 14.9



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Spencer Moore 107.6
Angela Ziff 177.5
Sara Williams 187.3
Kennedy Allen 224.4
Caitlin Amburgey 229.9
Nicole Snow 243.4
Lindy Eskin 251.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 0.1% 0.1 26
27 0.4% 0.4 27
28 1.5% 1.5 28
29 3.1% 3.1 29
30 9.8% 9.8 30
31 14.9% 14.9 31
32 21.5% 21.5 32
33 38.4% 38.4 33
34 9.6% 9.6 34
35 0.9% 0.9 35
36 0.1% 0.1 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0