Chesterton
Boys -
Girls
2004
-
2005 -
2006
Switch to All-time Team Page
|
State Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at State Finals |
0.2% |
Top 10 at State Finals |
8.2% |
Advance to State Finals |
62.0% |
Advance to Semi-State |
100.0% |
Advance to Regional |
100.0% |
|
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
5 |
Adam Martin |
12 |
15:48 |
|
Chester Vanek |
10 |
16:57 |
|
Greg Osborn |
12 |
17:16 |
|
Russell Wilk |
11 |
17:18 |
|
Alex Sisto |
11 |
17:33 |
|
Tim Carmody |
11 |
17:34 |
|
Dan Osborn |
11 |
18:01 |
|
IHSAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 10,000 simulations of the IHSAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Avg Finish | Avg Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
State Finals |
62.0% |
13.7 |
320 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
3.2 |
4.2 |
5.5 |
7.2 |
8.9 |
10.1 |
9.8 |
5.8 |
1.8 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
Semi-State |
100% |
5.0 |
154 |
0.2 |
6.3 |
11.7 |
18.3 |
25.5 |
25.7 |
8.1 |
2.6 |
1.0 |
0.4 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regionals |
100% |
2.8 |
69 |
0.2 |
21.9 |
74.7 |
3.1 |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sectionals |
100% |
2.8 |
59 |
0.3 |
23.7 |
76.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
Indv No Team: Chance of running in round if team did not advance.
Indv: Chance of being in position to advance to round regardless of whether the team advanced.
State Meet | Advances to Round | Avg Finish |
Finishing Place |
| Indv No Team | Indv |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Adam Martin |
100% |
6.2 |
1.1 |
5.1 |
12.4 |
11.8 |
9.6 |
8.7 |
6.8 |
6.1 |
5.5 |
4.8 |
3.8 |
3.3 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
2.6 |
2.0 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
Chester Vanek |
62.0% |
86.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1% |
4.5% |
Greg Osborn |
62.0% |
114.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0% |
0.1% |
Russell Wilk |
62.0% |
116.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
Alex Sisto |
62.0% |
133.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
Tim Carmody |
62.0% |
134.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
Dan Osborn |
62.0% |
155.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
Semi-State | Advances to Round | Avg Finish |
Finishing Place |
| Indv No Team | Indv |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Adam Martin |
100% |
1.0 |
58.4 |
27.2 |
9.1 |
3.3 |
1.2 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0% |
Regionals | Advances to Round | Avg Finish |
Finishing Place |
| Indv No Team | Indv |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Adam Martin |
100% |
1.0 |
95.0 |
4.5 |
0.4 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0% |
Sectionals | Avg Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Adam Martin |
1.0 |
95.7 |
3.9 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|