Portage
Boys -
Girls
2010
-
2011 -
2012
Switch to All-time Team Page
|
|
| State Champion |
0.0% |
| Top 5 at State Finals |
0.0% |
| Top 10 at State Finals |
0.0% |
| Advance to State Finals |
47.3% |
| Advance to Semi-State |
100.0% |
| Advance to Regional |
100.0% |
|
| Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
|---|
| 141 |
Anthony Best |
10 |
16:46 |
|
Robert Blackwell |
12 |
16:58 |
|
Dustin Balboa |
10 |
17:08 |
|
Max Zmija |
12 |
17:10 |
|
Tyler Swets |
12 |
17:45 |
|
Tylor Hudson |
9 |
17:46 |
|
Cory Lamping |
12 |
17:57 |
|
Tim Huber |
11 |
17:57 |
|
David Clegg |
10 |
17:58 |
|
Mauricio Martinez |
10 |
18:38 |
|
Jacob Thielbar |
10 |
18:39 |
|
Nick Heimberg |
9 |
19:06 |
|
| Date | Race |
Rating |
|---|
| 08/27 |
Gavit Invite (AA) |
512 |
| 09/03 |
Harrison Invitational |
492 |
| 09/17 |
New Prairie Invitational (AAA) |
517 |
| 09/24 |
Culver Invitational (Open) |
489 |
| 09/24 |
Culver Invitational (Fr/So) |
|
| 10/11 |
Chesterton Sectional |
487 |
| 10/15 |
New Prairie Regional |
505 |
| 10/22 |
New Prairie Semi-State |
486 |
|
IHSAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 10,000 simulations of the IHSAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Avg Finish | Avg Score |
Finishing Place |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
| State Finals |
47.3% |
20.3 |
501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
1.2 |
2.1 |
3.0 |
4.1 |
5.1 |
6.2 |
6.7 |
6.8 |
6.4 |
4.6 |
| Semi-State |
100% |
6.8 |
189 |
0.1 |
3.8 |
6.6 |
10.9 |
12.8 |
13.2 |
13.3 |
11.9 |
9.8 |
8.1 |
5.8 |
3.0 |
0.7 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Regionals |
100% |
4.2 |
91 |
0.1 |
6.9 |
17.7 |
27.8 |
47.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sectionals |
100% |
4.2 |
100 |
0.1 |
7.1 |
17.7 |
27.5 |
47.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
Indv No Team: Chance of running in round if team did not advance.
Indv: Chance of being in position to advance to round regardless of whether the team advanced.
| State Meet | Advances to Round | Avg Finish |
Finishing Place |
| Indv No Team | Indv |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| Anthony Best |
48.1% |
90.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5% |
14.6% |
| Robert Blackwell |
47.3% |
111.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0% |
1.7% |
| Dustin Balboa |
47.3% |
127.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0% |
0.1% |
| Max Zmija |
47.3% |
131.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
| Tyler Swets |
47.3% |
173.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
| Tylor Hudson |
47.3% |
174.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
| Cory Lamping |
47.3% |
181.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
| Semi-State | Advances to Round | Avg Finish |
Finishing Place |
| Indv No Team | Indv |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| Anthony Best |
100% |
23.7 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
3.1 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
4.8 |
4.4 |
4.8 |
4.8 |
4.8 |
|
68.5% |
| Regionals | Advances to Round | Avg Finish |
Finishing Place |
| Indv No Team | Indv |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| Anthony Best |
100% |
12.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
1.4 |
2.5 |
3.8 |
5.1 |
6.7 |
7.1 |
8.6 |
8.9 |
8.5 |
7.9 |
7.5 |
6.3 |
6.1 |
4.9 |
3.9 |
3.1 |
2.3 |
1.6 |
1.3 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
|
81.7% |
| Sectionals | Avg Finish |
Finishing Place |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| Anthony Best |
11.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
5.9 |
7.2 |
9.1 |
9.6 |
9.4 |
9.1 |
8.3 |
7.6 |
6.6 |
5.6 |
4.5 |
2.9 |
2.1 |
1.3 |
1.0 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
