Boys - Girls
Rushville Regional
2008 - 2009 - 2010



These are rankings of individuals and teams that feed into this regional. It is not a projected order of finish in the race.
Below the rankings is a projection of this round of the tournament.


RankNameGradeSchoolRatingState Rank
1  Dani Sullivan 12 Franklin Central 18:39 #5  
2  Jasmine Al-Anzi 10 Franklin Central 19:03 #17  
3  Carolyn Talhelm 9 Franklin Central 19:32 #57  
4  Courtney Edon 11 New Palestine 19:32 #58  
5  Rebekah Jones 12 Warren Central 19:45 #80  
6  Nadia Al-Anzi 11 Franklin Central 20:00 #119  
7  Breanna Lawyer 11 Eastern Hancock 20:05 #130  
RankNameSectionalRatingState Rank
1  Franklin Central New Palestine 211 #5  
2  New Palestine New Palestine 486 #37  
3  Warren Central New Palestine 501 #38  



Regional Simulation



Based on results of 10,000 simulations of the IHSAA Tournament. Only teams that advanced out of the sectional simulation for each trial were included in the regional simulation for that trial. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.


SchoolAdvances to RoundAvg FinishAvg ScoreMin ScoreMax Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Franklin Central 100.0% 1.0 20 15 34 100.0
New Palestine 100.0% 2.4 56 32 71 56.3 43.7
Warren Central 100.0% 2.6 58 39 77 43.7 56.3


RunnerSchoolRatingAdvances to RoundAvg Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Dani Sullivan Franklin Central 18:39 100.0% 1.0 94.8 5.0 0.2
Jasmine Al-Anzi Franklin Central 19:03 100.0% 1.5 4.6 83.6 10.3 1.3 0.2
Carolyn Talhelm Franklin Central 19:32 100.0% 3.2 2.0 41.8 33.6 16.6 4.6 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0
Courtney Edon New Palestine 19:32 100.0% 3.2 0.6 7.6 34.5 30.5 16.1 6.4 2.6 1.1 0.4 0.1 0.1
Rebekah Jones Warren Central 19:45 100.0% 4.4 0.1 1.6 11.3 22.9 31.7 16.8 8.3 4.4 2.0 0.8 0.2 0.0
Nadia Al-Anzi Franklin Central 20:00 100.0% 6.1 0.5 5.9 16.1 26.1 22.8 14.6 8.3 3.9 1.4 0.4 0.1 0.0
Breanna Lawyer Eastern Hancock 20:05 100.0% 6.7 0.2 1.3 4.2 11.3 20.2 18.7 16.2 11.3 8.3 5.3 2.3 0.7 0.2 0.0