Pre-tourney Rankings
Marshall
Conference USA
2010-11
Overall
Predictive Rating+6.1#78
Expected Predictive Rating+6.2#79
Pace71.1#92
Improvement+2.4#71

Offense
Total Offense+3.1#81
Improvement+6.5#2

Defense
Total Defense+3.0#78
Improvement-4.1#322
NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0.0% n/a n/a
#1 Seed 0.0% n/a n/a
Top 2 Seed 0.0% n/a n/a
Top 4 Seed 0.0% n/a n/a
Top 6 Seed 0.0% n/a n/a
NCAA Tourney Bid 9.2% n/a n/a
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 9.2% n/a n/a
Average Seed 12.1 n/a n/a
.500 or above 0.0% n/a n/a
.500 or above in Conference 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Conference Champion 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Last Place in Conference 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
First Four8.6% n/a n/a
First Round3.6% n/a n/a
Second Round0.7% n/a n/a
Sweet Sixteen0.1% n/a n/a
Elite Eight0.0% n/a n/a
Final Four0.0% n/a n/a
Championship Game0.0% n/a n/a
National Champion0.0% n/a n/a

Projected Seeding Not in Tournament  


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Record Conf Rating Offense Defense
  Nov 20, 2010 271   Chattanooga L 68-69 92%     0 - 1 -10.9 -5.3 -4.7
  Nov 22, 2010 288   Jackson St. W 66-60 94%     1 - 1 -5.1 -5.7 -5.1
  Nov 27, 2010 11   @ Louisville L 66-80 11%     1 - 2 +5.3 +9.2 +9.4
  Nov 29, 2010 285   Florida International W 88-79 93%     2 - 2 -1.9 -5.1 -5.5
  Dec 04, 2010 155   @ Ohio W 65-57 58%     3 - 2 +12.1 +1.5 +2.9
  Dec 07, 2010 101   James Madison W 67-63 69%     4 - 2 +4.9 +0.0 +1.1
  Dec 15, 2010 265   @ Savannah St. W 56-47 80%     5 - 2 +6.0 -1.9 -0.7
  Dec 19, 2010 198   VMI W 98-70 86%     6 - 2 +22.7 -2.4 -1.8
  Dec 22, 2010 101   @ James Madison L 73-80 45%     6 - 3 +0.2 +3.2 +3.7
  Dec 28, 2010 308   Binghamton W 85-60 95%     7 - 3 +12.1 -5.9 -5.9
  Jan 02, 2011 138   @ St. Bonaventure W 74-65 54%     8 - 3 +14.1 +2.8 +2.8
  Jan 05, 2011 105   @ Central Florida L 58-65 47%     8 - 4 0 - 1 -0.1 +2.8 +3.8
  Jan 08, 2011 74   Southern Miss W 95-65 59%     9 - 4 1 - 1 +33.8 +2.4 +2.6
  Jan 10, 2011 265   Savannah St. W 71-57 92%     10 - 4 +4.6 -4.3 -4.4
  Jan 15, 2011 92   @ Memphis L 61-77 43%     10 - 5 1 - 2 -8.1 +3.5 +3.7
  Jan 19, 2011 17   West Virginia W 75-71 22%     11 - 5 +18.0 +7.1 +7.1
  Jan 22, 2011 141   East Carolina L 81-82 76%     11 - 6 1 - 3 -2.3 -0.3 -1.1
  Jan 26, 2011 68   @ UAB L 56-60 31%     11 - 7 1 - 4 +7.0 +5.0 +5.9
  Jan 29, 2011 92   Memphis W 85-70 67%     12 - 7 2 - 4 +16.6 +1.3 +0.9
  Feb 01, 2011 202   @ Houston W 63-62 70%     13 - 7 3 - 4 +1.6 +0.2 +0.4
  Feb 05, 2011 74   @ Southern Miss L 60-67 35%     13 - 8 3 - 5 +3.1 +4.4 +5.4
  Feb 09, 2011 68   UAB L 48-64 55%     13 - 9 3 - 6 -11.3 +1.7 +2.2
  Feb 12, 2011 141   @ East Carolina W 78-65 54%     14 - 9 4 - 6 +18.0 +2.6 +3.0
  Feb 16, 2011 153   Rice W 72-61 78%     15 - 9 5 - 6 +8.8 -0.7 -0.9
  Feb 19, 2011 180   @ Tulane W 79-75 OT 65%     16 - 9 6 - 6 +6.1 +1.3 +1.0
  Feb 23, 2011 87   Tulsa W 79-61 66%     17 - 9 7 - 6 +19.9 +1.3 +1.5
  Feb 26, 2011 150   SMU W 64-62 78%     18 - 9 8 - 6 +0.0 -0.8 -1.1
  Mar 02, 2011 67   @ UTEP L 74-82 31%     18 - 10 8 - 7 +3.1 +5.9 +4.8
  Mar 05, 2011 105   Central Florida W 83-69 70%     19 - 10 9 - 7 +14.6 +1.0 +0.3
  Mar 09, 2011 202   Houston W 97-87 79%     20 - 10 +7.4 -0.5 -1.6
  Mar 10, 2011 67   UTEP L 65-77 43%     20 - 11 -4.1 +3.6 +3.7
Projected Record 20.0 - 11.0 9.0 - 7.0




Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.



Projected Conference USA Finish

0-16 1-15 2-14 3-13 4-12 5-11 6-10 7-9 8-8 9-7 10-6 11-5 12-4 13-3 14-2 15-1 16-0 Total
1st 1st
2nd 2nd
3rd 3rd
4th 4th
5th 100.0 100.0 5th
6th 6th
7th 7th
8th 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 11th
12th 12th
Total 100.0 Total



Conference USA Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
16-0
15-1
14-2
13-3
12-4
11-5
10-6
9-7 0.0%
8-8
Total



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid		AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
16-0
15-1
14-2
13-3
12-4
11-5
10-6
9-7 100.0% 9.2% 9.2% 12.1 0.0 0.2 8.0 1.0 90.8 9.2%
8-8
7-9
6-10
5-11
4-12
3-13
2-14
1-15
0-16
Total 100% 9.2% 0.0% 9.2% 12.1 0.0 0.2 8.0 1.0 90.8 9.2%