UL-Monroe
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
671  Kipkirui Victor SO 33:14
881  Elias Keter SO 33:33
2,203  Brandon McDonald SO 35:34
2,211  John Neal SO 35:35
2,514  Jonathan Jeffcoat SR 36:21
2,794  Tanner Collins FR 37:31
2,859  Jansen Nowell FR 37:57
2,880  Jacob Holland SO 38:06
2,923  Cameron Tingle FR 38:34
3,037  Ryan Moss FR 40:48
National Rank #227 of 312
South Central Region Rank #23 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 22nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 18.5%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Kipkirui Victor Elias Keter Brandon McDonald John Neal Jonathan Jeffcoat Tanner Collins Jansen Nowell Jacob Holland Cameron Tingle Ryan Moss
Mississippi College Choctaw Open 10/15 1254 33:14 33:34 35:23 35:50 36:21 37:13 37:57 35:43 38:34 40:48
Sun Belt Conference 10/29 1323 32:44 35:32 35:31 36:41 38:02 41:28
South Central Region Championships 11/11 34:29 35:55 35:27 36:07





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 21.9 577 0.1 0.1 0.8 3.2 14.4 22.3 24.0 18.8 11.6 4.9



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kipkirui Victor 42.5 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.6 1.2 0.9 1.1
Elias Keter 55.2 0.1
Brandon McDonald 148.9
John Neal 150.2
Jonathan Jeffcoat 171.1
Tanner Collins 195.6
Jansen Nowell 204.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 0.8% 0.8 18
19 3.2% 3.2 19
20 14.4% 14.4 20
21 22.3% 22.3 21
22 24.0% 24.0 22
23 18.8% 18.8 23
24 11.6% 11.6 24
25 4.9% 4.9 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0