UL-Monroe
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,915  Elias Keter SR 35:12
1,963  Isaac Ndirangu FR 35:17
2,063  Chris Silva SR 35:27
2,205  Jonathan Jeffcoat SR 35:47
2,456  John Neal SR 36:27
2,628  Brandon McDonald SR 37:08
2,716  Jacob Holland SR 37:38
2,970  Lane Perilloux JR 40:25
National Rank #244 of 308
South Central Region Rank #24 of 32
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 24th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Elias Keter Isaac Ndirangu Chris Silva Jonathan Jeffcoat John Neal Brandon McDonald Jacob Holland Lane Perilloux
Chile Pepper Festival 10/02 1369 35:22 36:55 35:39 36:15 36:58 37:31
Alabama Crimson Classic Invitational 10/16 1376 35:18 35:38 36:25 35:49 36:48 37:31 37:55 40:27
Sun Belt Conference Championships 11/01 1326 34:53 34:38 34:21 36:58 37:00 36:30 37:15
South Central Regional Championships 11/13 1317 35:13 34:39 35:38 35:25 36:06 37:49 38:02





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 24.3 760 0.5 79.1 15.7 4.1 0.5 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Elias Keter 136.8
Isaac Ndirangu 141.0
Chris Silva 147.9
Jonathan Jeffcoat 158.6
John Neal 173.4
Brandon McDonald 185.6
Jacob Holland 194.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 0.5% 0.5 23
24 79.1% 79.1 24
25 15.7% 15.7 25
26 4.1% 4.1 26
27 0.5% 0.5 27
28 0.0% 0.0 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0