Duke
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
406  Nikhil Pulimood JR 32:39
432  CJ Ambrosio FR 32:42
682  Stephen Garrett JR 33:10
690  Alex Miley FR 33:11
752  Paul Dellinger FR 33:18
805  Alec Kunzweiler SR 33:23
807  Jordan Burton JR 33:23
901  Cole Hoff SO 33:31
906  Tom Sullivan SO 33:31
1,057  Matt Wisner SO 33:42
1,097  Josh Romine FR 33:46
1,135  Mike Ungvarsky FR 33:50
1,934  AJ Eckmann SO 34:59
1,959  Ethan Ready FR 35:02
2,135  Adamson Bryant SO 35:24
2,203  Zachary Alhamra SO 35:34
2,347  Kyle Francis SR 35:56
2,681  Matt Luppino SR 37:14
National Rank #95 of 315
Southeast Region Rank #15 of 48
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 11th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.1%
Top 10 in Regional 30.3%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Nikhil Pulimood CJ Ambrosio Stephen Garrett Alex Miley Paul Dellinger Alec Kunzweiler Jordan Burton Cole Hoff Tom Sullivan Matt Wisner Josh Romine
Winthrop/Adidas Invitational 09/16 871 32:17 32:29 33:21 33:08 32:23 33:01 32:47 33:34 33:40 35:08 33:33
Roy Griak Invitational 09/23 909 31:57 32:29 32:50 35:31 34:13 33:24 33:41 33:12 33:16
ECU Pirates Invitational 10/13 1077 33:24 33:17 33:18 32:55 33:13 34:38 33:15 33:11 33:25 33:16 34:30
ACC Championship 10/27 1031 32:38 33:11 33:06 32:56 33:16 34:28 33:44 33:21 33:55
Southeast Region Championships 11/10 1077 32:50 33:56 32:49 34:13 34:17 33:17 33:28





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 11.3 355 0.1 0.3 1.3 3.0 7.7 18.1 24.9 21.8 15.4 5.4 1.5 0.7 0.1 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nikhil Pulimood 52.4 0.1 0.1 0.3
CJ Ambrosio 54.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Stephen Garrett 81.5
Alex Miley 81.7
Paul Dellinger 90.4
Alec Kunzweiler 95.6
Jordan Burton 93.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.1% 0.1 5
6 0.3% 0.3 6
7 1.3% 1.3 7
8 3.0% 3.0 8
9 7.7% 7.7 9
10 18.1% 18.1 10
11 24.9% 24.9 11
12 21.8% 21.8 12
13 15.4% 15.4 13
14 5.4% 5.4 14
15 1.5% 1.5 15
16 0.7% 0.7 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 0.1% 0.1 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0