Florida A&M
Men -
Women
2015
-
2017 -
2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
160 |
David Too |
SO |
32:02 |
839 |
Festus Kemboi |
SO |
33:26 |
942 |
Onesmus Kemboi |
FR |
33:34 |
1,437 |
Boniface Mutai |
FR |
34:14 |
2,702 |
Titus Kibii |
FR |
37:22 |
2,947 |
James Oyetunji |
JR |
40:43 |
|
National Rank |
#144 of 315 |
South Region Rank |
#16 of 41 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
0.0% |
Most Likely Finish |
18th at Regional |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
85.4% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
David Too |
Festus Kemboi |
Onesmus Kemboi |
Boniface Mutai |
Titus Kibii |
James Oyetunji |
FSU Invitational |
10/06 |
1090 |
32:01 |
33:04 |
33:29 |
34:11 |
37:08 |
40:37 |
Bulldog Duels |
10/14 |
1182 |
32:25 |
33:32 |
33:56 |
34:23 |
37:43 |
40:02 |
MEAC Championship |
10/28 |
1349 |
32:29 |
34:03 |
33:33 |
|
37:29 |
42:38 |
South Region Championships |
11/10 |
|
31:56 |
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
18.5 |
532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
1.9 |
12.6 |
18.3 |
21.2 |
18.3 |
13.1 |
7.8 |
4.0 |
2.1 |
0.7 |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
David Too |
4.4% |
110.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
David Too |
14.2 |
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
0.8 |
2.0 |
3.2 |
6.6 |
7.7 |
7.3 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.1 |
5.8 |
5.8 |
4.4 |
4.5 |
3.0 |
3.2 |
2.9 |
2.7 |
2.3 |
1.9 |
1.6 |
Festus Kemboi |
74.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onesmus Kemboi |
82.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boniface Mutai |
121.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titus Kibii |
225.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Oyetunji |
252.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
10 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
12 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
13 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
12.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
18.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
21.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
18.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
13.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
7.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
22 |
23 |
2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
23 |
24 |
0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
24 |
25 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |