Nebraska
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
149  Wyatt McGuire JR 32:00
379  Austin Post SR 32:36
416  Mark Freyhof FR 32:40
734  Jordan De Spong SO 33:16
757  Bailey Timmons FR 33:19
825  Karson LeComte SO 33:25
939  Eric Karl II JR 33:33
984  Peter Spinks SR 33:37
1,096  Alec Sery SR 33:46
1,644  Alex Tollinger FR 34:32
National Rank #64 of 315
Midwest Region Rank #7 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.5%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 9.8%
Top 10 in Regional 97.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Wyatt McGuire Austin Post Mark Freyhof Jordan De Spong Bailey Timmons Karson LeComte Eric Karl II Peter Spinks Alec Sery Alex Tollinger
Woody Greeno/Jay Dirksen 09/16 987 32:25 32:30 33:08 33:37 33:43 33:07 34:11 35:10 34:26
Sam Bell Invitational 09/30 833 31:52 32:34 32:18 32:40 33:20 33:59 33:33 34:22 33:44 34:39
Bradley Pink Classic 10/13 897 31:58 32:10 33:25 33:34 33:27 33:19 33:06 33:16 34:31
Big Ten Championship 10/29 833 31:41 32:54 32:45 33:47 32:50 32:51 33:27 32:34 33:38
Midwest Region Championships 11/10 977 32:12 32:38 33:18 33:19 33:14 33:54 33:14





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.5% 28.9 736 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1
Region Championship 100% 7.2 231 0.1 0.1 1.4 8.3 26.7 25.6 21.1 10.0 4.7 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Wyatt McGuire 45.5% 119.1 0.1
Austin Post 0.8% 171.5
Mark Freyhof 0.7% 194.0
Jordan De Spong 0.5% 236.0
Bailey Timmons 0.5% 226.5
Karson LeComte 0.5% 240.0
Eric Karl II 0.5% 239.7


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Wyatt McGuire 8.1 1.8 5.6 6.9 9.4 8.5 6.3 6.0 5.4 5.2 4.0 4.2 2.6 3.2 1.7 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.7 0.8 1.5 1.6 1.5
Austin Post 35.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.9 1.6 2.1 2.3 2.1 2.4 2.4
Mark Freyhof 38.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.7 1.4 1.6 2.0 1.8 1.6
Jordan De Spong 73.2
Bailey Timmons 75.1
Karson LeComte 81.3
Eric Karl II 89.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 2
3 0.1% 0.1 3
4 1.4% 21.4% 0.1 0.2 0.1 1.1 0.3 4
5 8.3% 1.8% 0.1 0.1 0.1 8.2 0.2 5
6 26.7% 26.7 6
7 25.6% 25.6 7
8 21.1% 21.1 8
9 10.0% 10.0 9
10 4.7% 4.7 10
11 1.2% 1.2 11
12 0.7% 0.7 12
13 0.3% 0.3 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 0.5% 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 99.5 0.1 0.5




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Bradley 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0