Wofford
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,705  Cisco Ferre JR 34:38
1,824  Jack Zemp SO 34:49
2,067  Cristian Widenhouse SR 35:15
2,412  Joe Harbacevich JR 36:08
2,506  Ethan Epstein SO 36:25
2,544  Ben Hensley SR 36:33
2,595  Ben Boatwright JR 36:49
2,629  James McCoy FR 36:58
2,670  Walker Gibbs SO 37:11
2,795  William Stutts SR 38:00
National Rank #255 of 315
Southeast Region Rank #36 of 48
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 35th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Cisco Ferre Jack Zemp Cristian Widenhouse Joe Harbacevich Ethan Epstein Ben Hensley Ben Boatwright James McCoy Walker Gibbs William Stutts
Winthrop/Adidas Invitational 09/16 1328 35:38 34:12 35:13 35:51 37:16 36:48 38:06 36:44
Upstate Invitational 09/30 1320 35:07 34:38 35:11 35:43 36:29 36:35 36:58 37:53
High Point Vertcross 10/13 1351 34:28 34:53 37:02 36:33 37:17 36:26 36:18 38:10
Southern Conference Championship 10/28 1339 34:06 35:25 36:00 36:18 36:58 36:14 36:39 37:28 37:49





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 36.8 1052 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Cisco Ferre 166.1
Jack Zemp 177.3
Cristian Widenhouse 199.8
Joe Harbacevich 246.2
Ethan Epstein 257.9
Ben Hensley 263.1
Ben Boatwright 271.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 0.1% 0.1 31
32 0.4% 0.4 32
33 2.0% 2.0 33
34 13.3% 13.3 34
35 16.4% 16.4 35
36 16.4% 16.4 36
37 15.1% 15.1 37
38 12.7% 12.7 38
39 11.0% 11.0 39
40 6.9% 6.9 40
41 4.4% 4.4 41
42 1.7% 1.7 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0