Connecticut
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
860  Ericka Randazzo SO 21:23
906  Courtney Akerley SO 21:26
1,012  Haley Hasty SO 21:32
1,056  Mary Monda Oewel SO 21:35
1,171  Danielle Jordan FR 21:43
1,246  Lindsey Kane SO 21:47
1,444  Lauren Scahill SO 21:59
1,482  Hannah Parker SO 22:01
1,612  Katherine Foley JR 22:09
1,931  Alana Pearl JR 22:29
1,968  Maggie Christe JR 22:31
1,988  Hannah Fleming SO 22:32
2,003  Sydnee Over SR 22:33
2,171  Kelsey Swanson JR 22:44
2,259  Mackenzie Pias FR 22:51
2,501  Thalia Staiger SO 23:10
2,822  Megan McCollum FR 23:46
National Rank #168 of 344
Northeast Region Rank #20 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 16th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.3%
Top 20 in Regional 91.3%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Ericka Randazzo Courtney Akerley Haley Hasty Mary Monda Oewel Danielle Jordan Lindsey Kane Lauren Scahill Hannah Parker Katherine Foley Alana Pearl Maggie Christe
Umass Minuteman Invitational 09/10 1226 21:13 22:17 21:58 21:35 22:18 22:42 24:12
Paul Short Invitational (Gold) 10/01 1200 21:02 21:33 21:23 22:18 22:33 22:21 22:10
NEICAAA Championship 10/08 1243 21:54 21:40 21:48 22:07 23:06 22:23
Rothenberg-Brown Invitational 10/14 1205 21:33 21:22 21:42 21:36 21:28 21:47 21:42 22:09 21:58 23:02
American Conference Championship 10/29 1195 21:18 21:34 21:30 21:23 21:54 21:37 21:50 22:15 22:15
Northeast Region Championships 11/11 1181 21:50 21:10 21:19 21:24 21:55 21:35 21:33





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 16.9 522 0.2 0.1 0.7 1.6 3.9 9.9 15.6 17.3 13.9 11.4 10.1 6.9 3.8 2.4 1.3 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Ericka Randazzo 92.4 0.1
Courtney Akerley 96.7
Haley Hasty 106.6
Mary Monda Oewel 111.7
Danielle Jordan 123.1
Lindsey Kane 130.0
Lauren Scahill 150.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 0.2% 0.2 9
10 0.1% 0.1 10
11 0.7% 0.7 11
12 1.6% 1.6 12
13 3.9% 3.9 13
14 9.9% 9.9 14
15 15.6% 15.6 15
16 17.3% 17.3 16
17 13.9% 13.9 17
18 11.4% 11.4 18
19 10.1% 10.1 19
20 6.9% 6.9 20
21 3.8% 3.8 21
22 2.4% 2.4 22
23 1.3% 1.3 23
24 0.7% 0.7 24
25 0.2% 0.2 25
26 0.3% 0.3 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 0.1% 0.1 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0