Connecticut
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
167  Emily Durgin SR 20:13
369  Laura Williamson SR 20:42
416  Alexis Panisse SR 20:47
853  Courtney Ackerley FR 21:24
1,066  Hannah Parker FR 21:39
1,081  Abby Mace SR 21:41
1,190  Haley Hasty FR 21:48
1,219  Liz Lagoy SO 21:50
1,265  Lisa Zimmer JR 21:53
1,639  Maggie Christe SO 22:19
National Rank #79 of 339
Northeast Region Rank #11 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 11th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.8%
Top 10 in Regional 29.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Emily Durgin Laura Williamson Alexis Panisse Courtney Ackerley Hannah Parker Abby Mace Haley Hasty Liz Lagoy Lisa Zimmer Maggie Christe
Coast to Coast Battle in Beantown 09/25 1023 20:23 20:52 21:21 21:07 21:19 21:32 21:36 21:38 22:19
Paul Short Invitational (Gold) 10/02 1256 21:57
NEICAAA Championship 10/10 1252 21:47 21:49
D1 Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/17 932 20:11 20:41 20:41 21:34 21:24 21:34 22:02
American Athletic Conference Championship 10/31 950 20:05 20:48 20:45 21:24 21:48 22:47 21:59 23:00
Northeast Region Championships 11/13 998 20:24 20:32 21:06 21:23 21:50 23:08 22:26





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0% 29.0 694 0.0 0.0
Region Championship 100% 11.3 322 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.7 2.0 3.5 7.9 14.9 27.4 18.0 12.0 6.8 4.0 1.8 0.1 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emily Durgin 6.7% 98.5 0.0 0.0
Laura Williamson 0.1% 185.5
Alexis Panisse 0.0% 151.0
Courtney Ackerley 0.0% 227.0
Hannah Parker 0.0% 248.0
Abby Mace 0.0% 233.0
Haley Hasty 0.0% 249.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emily Durgin 17.9 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.6 2.2 2.4 3.4 3.3 4.2 4.5 4.4 5.1 5.1 5.4 6.1 5.5 5.4 4.9 4.4 3.4 3.8 3.2
Laura Williamson 39.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.8 1.3 1.7 1.7 2.1 2.0
Alexis Panisse 45.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 1.3 1.4 1.3
Courtney Ackerley 99.8
Hannah Parker 123.2
Abby Mace 125.2
Haley Hasty 135.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 2
3 0.1% 20.0% 0.0 0.1 0.0 3
4 0.2% 0.2 4
5 0.5% 0.5 5
6 0.7% 0.7 6
7 2.0% 2.0 7
8 3.5% 3.5 8
9 7.9% 7.9 9
10 14.9% 14.9 10
11 27.4% 27.4 11
12 18.0% 18.0 12
13 12.0% 12.0 13
14 6.8% 6.8 14
15 4.0% 4.0 15
16 1.8% 1.8 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 0.1% 0.1 18
19 0.0% 0.0 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 0.0% 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas 43.8% 1.0 0.4
Stephen F. Austin 9.1% 1.0 0.1
Rice 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Missouri 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.6
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0