Gardner-Webb
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
2,534  Gabby Cortese JR 23:13
2,843  Jenna Ford SR 23:49
3,104  Rachel White JR 24:33
3,105  Sydney Davis JR 24:33
3,319  Brittany Ollivierre FR 25:31
3,341  Hannah Jones FR 25:38
3,357  Michaela Williams JR 25:43
3,386  Amy Turlington FR 25:57
National Rank #310 of 344
Southeast Region Rank #46 of 50
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 46th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Gabby Cortese Jenna Ford Rachel White Sydney Davis Brittany Ollivierre Hannah Jones Michaela Williams Amy Turlington
UNC-Asheville Invitational 09/10 1563 23:18 23:26 25:29 24:28 25:48 26:08 26:09
adidas Challenge 09/16 1550 23:41 23:58 24:29 24:30 26:39 25:30 25:36
High Point Vert Invitational 10/14 1533 23:08 24:13 24:03 24:34 25:33 26:13 27:11
Big South Championships 10/28 1517 23:22 24:16 24:20 24:23 24:39 25:01 24:55 25:40





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 45.2 1395



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Gabby Cortese 236.1
Jenna Ford 266.1
Rachel White 291.4
Sydney Davis 291.4
Brittany Ollivierre 312.7
Hannah Jones 314.8
Michaela Williams 316.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 0.1% 0.1 40
41 2.0% 2.0 41
42 3.2% 3.2 42
43 7.5% 7.5 43
44 14.3% 14.3 44
45 23.0% 23.0 45
46 35.8% 35.8 46
47 12.5% 12.5 47
48 1.6% 1.6 48
49 0.2% 0.2 49
50 50
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0