Gardner-Webb
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,817  Gabby Cortese SO 22:30
1,992  Claire Cates SR 22:42
2,232  Jenna Ford JR 23:00
3,034  Rachel White SO 24:54
3,097  Sydney Davis SO 25:11
3,127  Michaela Williams SO 25:22
3,145  Lauren Kilpatrick FR 25:30
National Rank #291 of 339
Southeast Region Rank #39 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 39th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Gabby Cortese Claire Cates Jenna Ford Rachel White Sydney Davis Michaela Williams Lauren Kilpatrick
Upstate Invitational 10/03 1443 22:24 22:34 23:02 24:53 25:48 26:17 25:32
Gene Mullin Invitational 10/10 1432 22:39 22:26 22:55 24:56 25:10 25:45
College of Charleston Classic Invitational 10/16 1423 22:48 22:24 23:00 24:43 25:03 24:51 25:19
Big South Championship 10/31 1452 22:17 23:03 23:05 25:10 25:02 25:20 25:33
Southeast Region Championships 11/13 22:33 23:19





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 37.6 1197



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Gabby Cortese 191.0
Claire Cates 205.6
Jenna Ford 225.8
Rachel White 286.4
Sydney Davis 290.7
Michaela Williams 293.7
Lauren Kilpatrick 295.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 0.1% 0.1 33
34 3.1% 3.1 34
35 7.9% 7.9 35
36 13.4% 13.4 36
37 18.6% 18.6 37
38 23.5% 23.5 38
39 27.0% 27.0 39
40 5.3% 5.3 40
41 0.7% 0.7 41
42 0.2% 0.2 42
43 0.1% 0.1 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0