UL-Lafayette
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,378  Courtney Musgrove SR 21:55
2,141  Lindsay Lagarde JR 22:43
2,707  Courtney Broussard JR 23:32
2,948  Kaylei Esfeller SR 24:06
3,211  Hailey Hesterman SO 24:56
3,559  Amber Campbell FR 28:25
3,622  D'Sharee Collins SO 32:03
National Rank #293 of 344
South Central Region Rank #24 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 23rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.1%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Courtney Musgrove Lindsay Lagarde Courtney Broussard Kaylei Esfeller Hailey Hesterman Amber Campbell D'Sharee Collins
LSU Invitational 09/17 1341 21:32 22:33 23:25 24:13 25:24
Chile Pepper Festival 10/01 1401 22:12 22:59 23:45 24:30 25:05
Mississippi College Choctaw Open 10/15 22:08 22:46 23:18 24:47
Sun Belt Conference 10/29 1414 21:39 22:22 23:12 24:04 25:32 28:26 32:04
South Central Region Championships 11/11 22:31 22:32





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 23.1 681 0.1 0.6 3.9 75.5 19.8 0.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Courtney Musgrove 70.6
Lindsay Lagarde 109.2
Courtney Broussard 149.2
Kaylei Esfeller 167.0
Hailey Hesterman 183.1
Amber Campbell 223.1
D'Sharee Collins 233.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 0.1% 0.1 20
21 0.6% 0.6 21
22 3.9% 3.9 22
23 75.5% 75.5 23
24 19.8% 19.8 24
25 0.2% 0.2 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0