UL-Lafayette
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,100  Courtney Musgrove JR 21:42
1,647  Claire Hodges JR 22:19
1,833  Anna Devitt SR 22:31
2,275  Kelci Lyons SR 23:05
2,415  Hailey Hesterman FR 23:17
2,484  Lindsay Lagarde SO 23:23
2,537  Danielle Castaldi SR 23:29
2,539  Ashley Irwin SR 23:29
2,543  Kaylei Esfeller JR 23:30
2,904  Courtney Broussard SO 24:24
National Rank #253 of 339
South Central Region Rank #22 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 22nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 47.3%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Courtney Musgrove Claire Hodges Anna Devitt Kelci Lyons Hailey Hesterman Lindsay Lagarde Danielle Castaldi Ashley Irwin Kaylei Esfeller Courtney Broussard
Texas A&M Invitational 09/26 1321 21:32 22:18 23:07 23:18 23:25 23:47
McNeese Cowboy Stampede 10/03 1261 21:44 21:59 21:55 22:20 22:53 23:06 23:03 23:26 23:43 24:00
Ragin' Cajuns Invitational 10/16 1271 22:13 22:19 21:32 23:27 22:56 23:59 22:46 22:58 26:01
Sun Belt Conference Championships 11/01 1357 21:44 22:38 24:39 23:27 23:47 23:49 23:32





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 20.2 515 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.7 2.5 4.6 7.3 12.3 17.3 22.0 23.2 6.2 1.3



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Courtney Musgrove 60.5 0.0 0.1
Claire Hodges 89.2
Anna Devitt 98.9
Kelci Lyons 130.3
Hailey Hesterman 141.2
Lindsay Lagarde 146.2
Danielle Castaldi 150.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 0.1% 0.1 11
12 0.2% 0.2 12
13 0.4% 0.4 13
14 0.8% 0.8 14
15 1.7% 1.7 15
16 2.5% 2.5 16
17 4.6% 4.6 17
18 7.3% 7.3 18
19 12.3% 12.3 19
20 17.3% 17.3 20
21 22.0% 22.0 21
22 23.2% 23.2 22
23 6.2% 6.2 23
24 1.3% 1.3 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0