USC
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
682  Sophia Racette FR 21:11
1,196  Amber Gore SO 21:44
1,915  Vivian Grimes SR 22:28
2,057  Mikaela Smith SO 22:37
2,235  Rebekah Ent JR 22:49
2,326  Chloe Berry FR 22:55
2,448  Lorea Ibarzabal SR 23:05
2,623  Lauren Maurer SO 23:22
2,966  Rachel Glynn SO 24:08
National Rank #207 of 344
West Region Rank #31 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 30th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Sophia Racette Amber Gore Vivian Grimes Mikaela Smith Rebekah Ent Chloe Berry Lorea Ibarzabal Lauren Maurer Rachel Glynn
UC Riverside Invitational 09/17 1234 21:18 21:43 22:17 22:34 23:22 22:50 22:45 23:02
CXC West Region Preview 10/01 1240 21:21 21:23 22:17 22:33 22:54 23:36 22:49 23:16
Highlander Invitational 10/15 1231 21:08 21:34 22:55 22:21 22:42 22:28 23:30 23:38 24:37
Pac-12 Conference 10/28 1271 20:54 22:23 23:01 23:00 23:21
West Region Championships 11/11 21:12 21:32





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 29.9 855 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.8 1.4 5.3 12.5 19.1 23.6 16.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sophia Racette 98.0
Amber Gore 141.8
Vivian Grimes 198.1
Mikaela Smith 206.2
Rebekah Ent 216.0
Chloe Berry 220.6
Lorea Ibarzabal 227.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 0.1% 0.1 21
22 22
23 0.1% 0.1 23
24 0.4% 0.4 24
25 0.8% 0.8 25
26 1.4% 1.4 26
27 5.3% 5.3 27
28 12.5% 12.5 28
29 19.1% 19.1 29
30 23.6% 23.6 30
31 16.2% 16.2 31
32 13.3% 13.3 32
33 6.8% 6.8 33
34 0.7% 0.7 34
35 0.1% 0.1 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0