USC
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
794  Katerina Berdousi JR 21:19
1,143  Rebekah Ent SO 21:45
1,536  Jenna Tong SR 22:12
1,591  Madison Ricks SO 22:16
1,701  Amber Gore FR 22:22
2,111  Mikaela Smith FR 22:51
2,475  Taylor Seamans FR 23:23
2,583  Rachel Glynn FR 23:34
2,684  Lauren Maurer FR 23:47
National Rank #199 of 339
West Region Rank #28 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 29th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.1%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Katerina Berdousi Rebekah Ent Jenna Tong Madison Ricks Amber Gore Mikaela Smith Taylor Seamans Rachel Glynn Lauren Maurer
UNLV Invitational 10/03 1237 21:13 22:04 22:11 22:14 22:30 22:46 23:34 23:28 22:58
UCR - Highlander Invitational 10/17 1254 21:54 21:58 22:23 22:20 22:05 22:41 23:15 23:35 24:35
Pac 12 Championships 10/30 1266 21:16 21:38 22:26 22:31 23:31 23:47
West Region Championships 11/13 21:17 21:34 21:51





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 29.3 834 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.0 1.3 2.4 4.4 8.8 15.7 20.5 18.0 11.6



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Katerina Berdousi 106.8
Rebekah Ent 147.7
Jenna Tong 187.4
Madison Ricks 191.7
Amber Gore 201.1
Mikaela Smith 232.0
Taylor Seamans 253.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 0.1% 0.1 19
20 0.1% 0.1 20
21 0.1% 0.1 21
22 0.4% 0.4 22
23 1.0% 1.0 23
24 1.3% 1.3 24
25 2.4% 2.4 25
26 4.4% 4.4 26
27 8.8% 8.8 27
28 15.7% 15.7 28
29 20.5% 20.5 29
30 18.0% 18.0 30
31 11.6% 11.6 31
32 7.3% 7.3 32
33 4.4% 4.4 33
34 2.1% 2.1 34
35 1.3% 1.3 35
36 0.5% 0.5 36
37 0.1% 0.1 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0