Mercer
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,519  Ania Grzeszczak SO 22:01
2,085  Courtney Czerniak SR 22:38
2,263  Kimberly Whiting SO 22:53
2,575  Marina Van Sickle FR 23:23
2,775  Kingsley Green JR 23:50
3,150  Madison Cowart FR 25:30
3,155  Nidhi Shashidhara SO 25:32
National Rank #276 of 348
South Region Rank #33 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 35th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Ania Grzeszczak Courtney Czerniak Kimberly Whiting Marina Van Sickle Kingsley Green Madison Cowart Nidhi Shashidhara
Bulldog SEC Preview 09/09 1321 22:44 22:32 22:22 23:00 23:44
Upstate Invitational 09/30 1341 22:10 22:37 22:58 23:20 23:45 24:19 25:03
Crimson Classic 10/13 1370 21:54 22:40 23:10 23:42 24:15 26:18
Southern Conference Championship 10/28 1337 21:44 22:39 22:44 23:35 23:46 25:40
South Region Championships 11/10 1410 21:48 22:32 23:00 23:19 26:15





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 33.9 953 0.6 1.6 2.2 4.1 5.7



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Ania Grzeszczak 130.9
Courtney Czerniak 175.1
Kimberly Whiting 191.8
Marina Van Sickle 219.0
Kingsley Green 236.8
Madison Cowart 277.2
Nidhi Shashidhara 277.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 0.6% 0.6 27
28 1.6% 1.6 28
29 2.2% 2.2 29
30 4.1% 4.1 30
31 5.7% 5.7 31
32 8.8% 8.8 32
33 12.9% 12.9 33
34 17.3% 17.3 34
35 21.5% 21.5 35
36 19.1% 19.1 36
37 5.1% 5.1 37
38 1.1% 1.1 38
39 0.3% 0.3 39
40 0.1% 0.1 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0