Texas A&M-CC
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
663  Allyson Girard JR 21:05
1,381  Valentina Campos FR 21:53
1,526  Cynthia Quiroga JR 22:01
1,573  Liz Romo SR 22:04
1,704  Sydney Cole FR 22:13
2,109  Morgan McCutchen SO 22:40
2,364  Samantha Miller JR 23:03
2,436  Bridgette Kozar SR 23:09
National Rank #199 of 348
South Central Region Rank #14 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 14th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 5.8%
Top 20 in Regional 98.1%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Allyson Girard Valentina Campos Cynthia Quiroga Liz Romo Sydney Cole Morgan McCutchen Samantha Miller Bridgette Kozar
UIW Invitational 10/07 1226 21:08 21:55 22:11 21:55 22:06 23:11 22:56 22:44
Southland Conference 10/27 1226 21:13 21:40 21:53 22:18 22:00 22:33 23:07 22:57
South Region Championships 11/10 1221 21:01 22:02 22:06 22:04 22:31 22:58 23:48





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 14.8 402 0.4 0.7 1.5 3.2 5.6 9.0 12.1 14.3 13.3 12.0 10.7 7.4 4.5 3.7 1.4 0.5 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Allyson Girard 37.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.1 0.8 1.4
Valentina Campos 79.7
Cynthia Quiroga 87.8
Liz Romo 89.9
Sydney Cole 100.9
Morgan McCutchen 132.5
Samantha Miller 159.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 0.4% 0.4 7
8 0.7% 0.7 8
9 1.5% 1.5 9
10 3.2% 3.2 10
11 5.6% 5.6 11
12 9.0% 9.0 12
13 12.1% 12.1 13
14 14.3% 14.3 14
15 13.3% 13.3 15
16 12.0% 12.0 16
17 10.7% 10.7 17
18 7.4% 7.4 18
19 4.5% 4.5 19
20 3.7% 3.7 20
21 1.4% 1.4 21
22 0.5% 0.5 22
23 0.1% 0.1 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0