UMBC
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
2,101  Briana Roberts SO 22:39
2,356  Kelsey Ponton JR 23:02
2,439  Courtney Mattson SR 23:10
2,701  Emma Kartalia FR 23:39
2,714  Kaya Knake SO 23:41
2,828  Pam Koga SO 24:01
2,920  Sofia Zarate FR 24:18
2,940  Bridgett Redding SO 24:23
2,951  Edith Torres FR 24:25
3,002  Alexis Bartelloni JR 24:36
National Rank #284 of 348
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #28 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 28th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Briana Roberts Kelsey Ponton Courtney Mattson Emma Kartalia Kaya Knake Pam Koga Sofia Zarate Bridgett Redding Edith Torres Alexis Bartelloni
Salty Dog Invitational 09/09 1349 22:23 23:12 22:59 23:36 24:18 25:04 24:33 24:20 24:28
Paul Short Brown 09/29 1341 22:42 23:02 23:27 23:22 22:34 24:03 24:05 24:53 24:44
Princeton Invitational 10/14 1416 23:20 23:00 23:17 24:25 23:59 24:08 24:11 24:04 25:56
America East Championship 10/28 1389 22:48 23:41 23:13 23:29 23:33 24:09 24:01 24:14 24:34 24:35





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 27.9 918 2.9 13.1 79.0 4.4 0.7



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Briana Roberts 161.6
Kelsey Ponton 178.8
Courtney Mattson 182.9
Emma Kartalia 197.8
Kaya Knake 198.8
Pam Koga 208.5
Sofia Zarate 216.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 2.9% 2.9 26
27 13.1% 13.1 27
28 79.0% 79.0 28
29 4.4% 4.4 29
30 0.7% 0.7 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 0.1% 0.1 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0