UTSA
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,171  Yulisa Abundis JR 21:39
1,344  Amber Boyd FR 21:50
2,154  Emily Voss JR 22:44
2,236  Gabby Gonzales SO 22:50
2,290  Colleen Gilbert SO 22:56
2,491  Charlette Janicek JR 23:15
2,624  Sarah Estrada SO 23:28
2,707  Olivia Flores SO 23:40
2,735  Lynette Amaram SO 23:43
National Rank #245 of 348
South Central Region Rank #23 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 22nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 13.4%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Yulisa Abundis Amber Boyd Emily Voss Gabby Gonzales Colleen Gilbert Charlette Janicek Sarah Estrada Olivia Flores Lynette Amaram
Texas Invitational 09/14 1284 21:44 22:15 23:30 22:54 22:40 22:55 24:11 23:13 23:32
Joe Piane Invitational (Gold) 09/29 1280 21:32 22:08 22:54 22:38 23:01 23:19
Aggieland Open 10/06 1494 23:23 23:34 23:35
Conference USA Championship 10/28 1286 21:47 21:56 22:42 22:59 22:52 24:02 23:29 23:33 24:05
South Region Championships 11/10 1258 21:30 21:24 22:35 22:30 23:11 23:20 24:31





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 22.0 577 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6 1.1 3.0 8.1 16.7 30.8 27.5 8.9 2.9



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Yulisa Abundis 66.0
Amber Boyd 77.4
Emily Voss 136.8
Gabby Gonzales 144.6
Colleen Gilbert 151.0
Charlette Janicek 170.7
Sarah Estrada 180.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 0.2% 0.2 15
16 0.5% 0.5 16
17 0.6% 0.6 17
18 1.1% 1.1 18
19 3.0% 3.0 19
20 8.1% 8.1 20
21 16.7% 16.7 21
22 30.8% 30.8 22
23 27.5% 27.5 23
24 8.9% 8.9 24
25 2.9% 2.9 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0