Grambling
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
2,392  Naomi Kiprop FR 23:06
2,421  Halima Chepkwony JR 23:09
2,854  Priscilla Kibet FR 24:06
3,171  Tichina Lewis SR 25:38
3,306  Brooklyn Allison JR 27:24
3,334  Abigael Jebet SO 28:12
3,374  Azah Cummins JR 30:19
3,403  Kyra Canty JR 35:54
National Rank #324 of 348
South Central Region Rank #32 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 32nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Naomi Kiprop Halima Chepkwony Priscilla Kibet Tichina Lewis Brooklyn Allison Abigael Jebet Azah Cummins Kyra Canty
McNeese State Cowboy Stampede 09/30 1682 22:55 22:50 23:55 28:12 28:38 31:58
Lois Davis Invitational 10/06 1703 22:26 22:10 23:25 28:00 31:56 35:37
Mississippi College Invitational 10/14 1637 23:22 23:58 24:06 25:35 27:59 29:33 36:11
SWAC Championship 10/23 1590 23:15 23:07 24:35 25:05 27:23 28:09 30:39 35:41





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 31.5 968 0.1 1.4 4.0 9.7 17.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Naomi Kiprop 162.4
Halima Chepkwony 164.4
Priscilla Kibet 191.7
Tichina Lewis 213.0
Brooklyn Allison 237.2
Abigael Jebet 240.8
Azah Cummins 250.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 1.4% 1.4 28
29 4.0% 4.0 29
30 9.7% 9.7 30
31 17.4% 17.4 31
32 66.9% 66.9 32
33 0.6% 0.6 33
34 0.1% 0.1 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0