Kennesaw State
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,261  Caitlyn Farrell JR 21:45
1,742  Saidah Grant SR 22:16
1,888  Katie Meyer FR 22:25
2,574  Reagan Poteet FR 23:23
2,683  Bonnie McKinnon SO 23:37
2,807  Brooke Aumer FR 23:56
3,052  Morgan Haney FR 24:48
National Rank #268 of 348
South Region Rank #31 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 29th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Caitlyn Farrell Saidah Grant Katie Meyer Reagan Poteet Bonnie McKinnon Brooke Aumer Morgan Haney
Stan Sims Invitational 09/08 1320 21:44 22:16 22:19 23:30 24:28 23:37 25:29
Commodore Classic 09/16 1315 21:53 22:23 22:23 23:42 23:17 23:35 25:07
Foothills Invitational 09/30 1319 21:48 22:02 22:07 23:20 23:51 24:05
Crimson Classic 10/13 1322 21:28 21:44 22:23 23:28 24:57 24:07 25:10
ASUN Championship 10/28 1309 21:49 22:51 22:30 22:55 23:25 24:32 24:06
South Region Championships 11/10 21:21 22:03 22:45





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 29.7 862 0.1 0.2 0.7 2.3 5.9 12.4 14.3 15.3 12.2 12.8



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Caitlyn Farrell 109.9
Saidah Grant 148.0
Katie Meyer 158.3
Reagan Poteet 218.6
Bonnie McKinnon 228.8
Brooke Aumer 239.4
Morgan Haney 263.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 0.1% 0.1 22
23 0.2% 0.2 23
24 0.7% 0.7 24
25 2.3% 2.3 25
26 5.9% 5.9 26
27 12.4% 12.4 27
28 14.3% 14.3 28
29 15.3% 15.3 29
30 12.2% 12.2 30
31 12.8% 12.8 31
32 8.6% 8.6 32
33 6.7% 6.7 33
34 4.7% 4.7 34
35 2.8% 2.8 35
36 1.3% 1.3 36
37 0.1% 0.1 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0