LSU
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
673  Ersula Farrow JR 21:06
1,197  Erika Lewis JR 21:41
1,313  Hannah Bourque JR 21:49
1,787  Kristin Delgado FR 22:19
1,835  Alicia Stamey FR 22:22
2,207  Hollie Parker JR 22:47
2,388  Rebecca Little SR 23:05
2,412  Isabella Hemb FR 23:08
2,453  Monica Guillot JR 23:11
2,668  Heather Cizek FR 23:35
3,025  Amelie Whitehurst SO 24:41
National Rank #200 of 348
South Central Region Rank #15 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 15th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 6.1%
Top 20 in Regional 98.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Ersula Farrow Erika Lewis Hannah Bourque Kristin Delgado Alicia Stamey Hollie Parker Rebecca Little Isabella Hemb Monica Guillot Heather Cizek Amelie Whitehurst
Bulldog SEC Preview 09/09 1234 21:05 21:26 22:07 22:49 24:16 23:47 22:44
LSU Invitational 09/16 1243 21:08 21:40 21:55 22:27 23:09 23:38 23:20 23:08 24:32
Texas A&M Invitational 09/23 1215 21:11 21:22 21:50 22:36 21:52 22:41 23:13 23:09 23:15
Crimson Classic 10/13 1208 21:04 21:34 21:32 22:09 22:16 23:25 22:53 23:08 24:48 24:06
SEC Championship 10/27 1246 21:22 22:14 21:47 22:50 21:58 23:35 23:23 23:08 23:08 23:57
South Region Championships 11/10 1192 20:46 21:50 22:11 22:00 22:24 22:37 22:56





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 15.1 407 0.4 0.4 1.7 3.6 5.2 7.2 10.4 12.2 15.1 13.4 10.0 7.9 6.5 4.2 1.5 0.5 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Ersula Farrow 38.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.5 1.4
Erika Lewis 68.5
Hannah Bourque 75.1
Kristin Delgado 108.4
Alicia Stamey 111.8
Hollie Parker 142.4
Rebecca Little 161.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 0.4% 0.4 7
8 0.4% 0.4 8
9 1.7% 1.7 9
10 3.6% 3.6 10
11 5.2% 5.2 11
12 7.2% 7.2 12
13 10.4% 10.4 13
14 12.2% 12.2 14
15 15.1% 15.1 15
16 13.4% 13.4 16
17 10.0% 10.0 17
18 7.9% 7.9 18
19 6.5% 6.5 19
20 4.2% 4.2 20
21 1.5% 1.5 21
22 0.5% 0.5 22
23 0.1% 0.1 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0