• Methodology
• All-Time
  • Season Archives
  • Program Rankings
  • Team Rankings
• 2026 - 2027
  • Team Rankings
  • Offense
  • Defenses
  • Conferences

  ---

  • Projected Seeding
  • Selection Simulation
  • At-Large Selection

  ---

  • Preseason

Preseason Rankings
New Haven
Northeast
2026-27

All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for details. Rating Rank INCC Stats Predictive Rating -11.9 352 INCC Stats Results Rating +0.0 1 Consistency Pace 60.6 352 Improvement - - Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free throws Shot Selection Offense F+ 356 D+ F+ D+ D- C- Defense D 322 D- C C- C+ D+ Offense Breakdown Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect Close Shots 36% 247 C+ 57% 131 -0.8 212 2 Pt. Jumpers 37% 181 D+ 32% 286 -0.7 220 Three Pointers 42% 157 D- 29% 345 -2.1 253 Selection / Accuracy C- -0.3 222 D+ -2.7 288 1st FG Attempt D+ 0.91 282 Second Chance F 20.6% 361 D+ 0.95 300 F+ 0.20 357 Opponents' Steals C 9.7% 214 Other Turnovers D- 9.2% 329 Turnovers D+ 18.8% 293 Freethrows D 0.26 320 C 72% 213 D- 0.19 327 Total Offense F+ -7.8 356 Assists Opponents' Blocks Close Shots D- 39% 319 C 11.3% 197 2 Pt. Jumpers Shots C- 23% 238 B+ 2.1% 14 Three Pointers B 94% 70 B 0.3% 47 Total D+ 53% 270 B- 4.7% 77 Defense Breakdown Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect Close Shots 40% 131 D 60% 309 +2.0 242 2 Pt. Jumpers 18% 278 D 40% 314 -0.8 122 Three Pointers 42% 136 D+ 34% 291 +1.1 243 Selection / Accuracy D+ +0.5 269 D- +3.7 344 1st FG Attempt D- 1.05 347 Second Chance B- 27.3% 75 D 1.13 311 C 0.31 184 Turnovers from Steals C- 8.8% 219 Other Turnovers C- 6.8% 236 Turnovers C- 15.7% 241 Freethrows B- 0.27 82 F 77% 357 C+ 0.21 133 Total Defense D -4.1 322 Assists Blocks Close Shots B 44% 48 D 7.2% 325 2 Pt. Jumpers Shots B- 22% 89 F+ 1.0% 353 Three Pointers B+ 80% 32 D+ 0.5% 262 Total B 52% 60 D- 3.3% 341 Miscellaneous Offense Defense Possession Length 20.2 365 16.5 42 Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.11 347 0.16 155 Consistency 0 0

NCAA Tournament Selection At-Large Chances Negligible (0%) Projected Seeding Not in Tournament   Prediction Ranges Pessimistic 5th Percentile Expected 50th Percentile Optimistic 95th Percentile Overall Record 5 - 22 10 - 18 16 - 13 Predictive Rating Rank 363 345 282 Results Rating Rank 363 339 256 Conference Record 3 - 13 7 - 9 11 - 5 Conference Finish 9 6 1 NCAA Tourney Seed None None 16 NCAA Tourney Finish None None Opening Round Now Win Next Lose Next #1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0% #1 Seed 0% 0% 0% Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0% Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0% Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0% Opening Round Bye 0% 0% 0% NCAA Tourney Bid 5% 8% 5% At-Large Status Negligible Negligible Negligible At-Large Bid 0% 0% 0% Average Seed 16.0 16.0 16.0 .500 or above 15% 34% 14% .500 or above in Conf 38% 50% 37% Conference Champion 7% 12% 7% Last Place in Conference 23% 23% 23% Opening Round 5% 8% 5% First Round 3% 4% 3% Second Round 0% 0% 0% Sweet Sixteen 0% 0% 0% Elite Eight 0% 0% 0% Final Four 0% 0% 0% Championship Game 0% 0% 0% National Champion 0% 0% 0% Next Game: Syracuse (Away) - 1% chance of victory Wins-Avg Loss Future Record Wins Chance At-Large Chance Avg Seed At-Large Selection Chances Indiv. Cumul. 23 - 6 23 - 6 0% 100% Negligible 22 - 7 22 - 7 0% 100% Negligible 21 - 8 21 - 8 0% 100% Negligible 20 - 9 20 - 9 0% 100% Negligible 19 - 10 19 - 10 1% 99% Negligible 18 - 11 18 - 11 1% 99% Negligible 17 - 12 17 - 12 2% 98% Negligible 16 - 13 16 - 13 3% 96% Negligible 15 - 14 15 - 14 5% 92% Negligible 14 - 15 14 - 15 6% 88% Negligible 13 - 16 13 - 16 8% 82% Negligible 12 - 17 12 - 17 9% 74% Negligible 11 - 17 11 - 17 10% 65% Negligible 10 - 18 10 - 18 11% 54% Negligible 9 - 19 9 - 19 11% 43% Negligible 8 - 20 8 - 20 10% 33% Negligible 7 - 20 7 - 20 9% 23% Negligible 6 - 21 6 - 21 6% 14% Negligible 5 - 22 5 - 22 4% 8% Negligible 4 - 23 4 - 23 2% 4% Negligible 3 - 24 3 - 24 1% 2% Negligible 2 - 25 2 - 25 0% 0% Negligible 1 - 26 1 - 26 0% 0% Negligible 0 - 27 0 - 27 0% 0% Negligible Projected Record by Quadrant Quad Projected Projected Cumulative Quad 1a 0 - 1 0 - 1 Quad 1b 0 - 1 0 - 2 Quad 2 0 - 2 0 - 4 Quad 3 0 - 2 0 - 6 Quad 4 10 - 12 10 - 18

Date		Opponent	Result/Prediction			Lead		Record		Total Rating		Offense					Defense
						Avg	Time	Overall	Conf			Total		First FGA	2nd Chance	TOs	Total		First FGA	2nd Chance	TOs
Mon, Nov 2		60 Syracuse	L	53 - 77	1%
Fri, Nov 6		85 Rutgers	L	55 - 76	2%
Tue, Nov 10		336 Army	W	65 - 64	55%
Sun, Nov 15		95 Penn St.	L	57 - 77	4%
Sat, Nov 21		331 New Hampshire	W	64 - 63	56%
Tue, Nov 24		308 Lindenwood	L	66 - 70	37%
Tue, Dec 1		360 Delaware St.	L	61 - 62	47%
Fri, Dec 4		202 Columbia	L	62 - 68	32%
Wed, Dec 9		332 NJIT	W	66 - 65	53%
Fri, Dec 18		225 Stony Brook	L	59 - 70	17%
Wed, Dec 30		23 Nebraska	L	50 - 80	1%
Sat, Jan 2		320 Mercyhurst	L	61 - 62	50%				✓
Mon, Jan 4		263 LIU Brooklyn	L	63 - 67	40%				✓
Fri, Jan 8		341 Wagner	W	63 - 61	52%				✓
Thu, Jan 14		338 Central Connecticut St.	L	59 - 64	37%				✓
Sat, Jan 16		349 Chicago St.	L	61 - 65	36%				✓
Thu, Jan 21		337 Fairleigh Dickinson	W	62 - 61	55%				✓
Sat, Jan 23		263 LIU Brooklyn	L	60 - 70	22%				✓
Wed, Jan 27		351 Stonehill	L	61 - 64	36%				✓
Sat, Jan 30		338 Central Connecticut St.	W	62 - 61	59%				✓
Wed, Feb 3		301 Le Moyne	L	66 - 67	49%				✓
Sat, Feb 6		341 Wagner	L	60 - 64	31%				✓
Thu, Feb 11		337 Fairleigh Dickinson	L	59 - 64	33%				✓
Sat, Feb 13		349 Chicago St.	W	64 - 62	58%				✓
Thu, Feb 18		301 Le Moyne	L	63 - 70	29%				✓
Sat, Feb 20		320 Mercyhurst	L	59 - 65	32%				✓
Thu, Feb 25		351 Stonehill	W	64 - 61	58%				✓
Totals								10 - 18	7 - 9		-12	F+	-8	C	D+	C-	D	-4	D-	C	D-

NCAA Tournament Selection

Wins-Avg Loss	Future Record	Wins Chance			Tourney Bid	Auto	At-Large	Avg Seed	At-Large Selection Chances		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16		No Bid
		Indiv.	Cumul.
23 - 6	23 - 6	0%	100%		51%	51%		16	Negligible																0	0		0
22 - 7	22 - 7	0%	100%		66%	66%		16	Negligible																0	0		0
21 - 8	21 - 8	0%	100%		79%	79%		16	Negligible																	0		0
20 - 9	20 - 9	0%	100%		67%	67%		16	Negligible																	0		0
19 - 10	19 - 10	1%	99%		52%	52%		16	Negligible																	0		0
18 - 11	18 - 11	1%	99%		41%	41%		16	Negligible																	1		1
17 - 12	17 - 12	2%	98%		37%	37%		16	Negligible																	1		1
16 - 13	16 - 13	3%	96%		22%	22%		16	Negligible																	1		3
15 - 14	15 - 14	5%	92%		18%	18%		16	Negligible																	1		4
14 - 15	14 - 15	6%	88%		11%	11%		16	Negligible																	1		5
13 - 16	13 - 16	8%	82%		8%	8%		16	Negligible																	1		7
12 - 17	12 - 17	9%	74%		4%	4%		16	Negligible																	0		9
11 - 17	11 - 17	10%	65%		2%	2%		16	Negligible																	0		10
10 - 18	10 - 18	11%	54%		1%	1%		16	Negligible																	0		11
9 - 19	9 - 19	11%	43%		0%	0%		16	Negligible																	0		11
8 - 20	8 - 20	10%	33%						Negligible																			10
7 - 20	7 - 20	9%	23%						Negligible																			9
6 - 21	6 - 21	6%	14%						Negligible																			6
5 - 22	5 - 22	4%	8%						Negligible																			4
4 - 23	4 - 23	2%	4%						Negligible																			2
3 - 24	3 - 24	1%	2%						Negligible																			1
2 - 25	2 - 25	0%	0%						Negligible																			0
1 - 26	1 - 26	0%	0%						Negligible																			0
0 - 27	0 - 27	0%	0%						Negligible																			0
Total		100%			5%	5%	0%	16	Negligible																	5		95

At-Large Selection Detail

Wins-Avg Loss	Future Record	Avg Conf Record	Wins Chance			At-Large	Opening Bye	Avg Seed	At-Large Selection Chances		Average Rating Rank			Average Quad Records
			Indiv.	Cumul.							Predictive	Results	NET	Quad 1	Quad 2	Quad 3	Quad 4
23 - 6	23 - 6	14 - 2	0%	100%					Negligible		211	132	175	1 - 1	1 - 1	1 - 0	21 - 3
22 - 7	22 - 7	14 - 2	0%	100%					Negligible		217	153	187	0 - 2	1 - 1	1 - 1	20 - 4
21 - 8	21 - 8	13 - 3	0%	100%					Negligible		223	167	196	0 - 2	0 - 1	0 - 1	20 - 4
20 - 9	20 - 9	12 - 4	0%	100%					Negligible		240	193	218	0 - 2	0 - 1	1 - 1	19 - 5
19 - 10	19 - 10	12 - 4	1%	99%					Negligible		260	207	236	0 - 2	0 - 1	1 - 1	18 - 5
18 - 11	18 - 11	11 - 5	1%	99%					Negligible		268	227	250	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 1	17 - 6
17 - 12	17 - 12	11 - 5	2%	98%					Negligible		284	246	268	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 1	16 - 7
16 - 13	16 - 13	10 - 6	3%	96%					Negligible		293	262	280	0 - 2	0 - 2	1 - 1	15 - 8
15 - 14	15 - 14	10 - 6	5%	92%					Negligible		304	278	293	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 1	14 - 9
14 - 15	14 - 15	9 - 7	6%	88%					Negligible		313	293	305	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 2	14 - 10
13 - 16	13 - 16	8 - 8	8%	82%					Negligible		323	307	317	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 2	13 - 10
12 - 17	12 - 17	8 - 8	9%	74%					Negligible		330	319	326	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 2	12 - 11
11 - 17	11 - 17	7 - 9	10%	65%					Negligible		338	331	336	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 2	11 - 12
10 - 18	10 - 18	7 - 9	11%	54%					Negligible		344	340	343	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 2	10 - 12
9 - 19	9 - 19	6 - 10	11%	43%					Negligible		349	347	349	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 2	9 - 13
8 - 20	8 - 20	5 - 11	10%	33%					Negligible		353	353	354	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 2	8 - 14
7 - 20	7 - 20	5 - 11	9%	23%					Negligible		356	357	358	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 2	7 - 15
6 - 21	6 - 21	4 - 12	6%	14%					Negligible		359	360	360	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 2	6 - 15
5 - 22	5 - 22	3 - 13	4%	8%					Negligible		360	362	362	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 2	5 - 16
4 - 23	4 - 23	3 - 13	2%	4%					Negligible		362	364	364	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 2	4 - 17
3 - 24	3 - 24	2 - 14	1%	2%					Negligible		363	364	364	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 2	3 - 18
2 - 25	2 - 25	1 - 15	0%	0%					Negligible		363	365	365	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 2	2 - 19
1 - 26	1 - 26	0 - 16	0%	0%					Negligible		365	365	365	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 2	1 - 20
0 - 27	0 - 27	0 - 16	0%	0%					Negligible		365	365	365	0 - 3	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 21
Total		7 - 9	100%			0%		16	Negligible		337	328	334	0 - 2	0 - 2	0 - 2	10 - 12

Projected Northeast Finish

	Wins Chance			Champ	Co-Champions					Finishing Place (Percent of all possible outcomes)
	Indiv.	Cumul.			0	1	2	3+		1st	2nd	3rd	4th	5th	6th	7th	8th	9th		Total
16-0
15-1	0%	100%		100%	100%					0										0
14-2	0%	100%		100%	97%	3%				0										0
13-3	1%	100%		97%	87%	10%				1	0									1
12-4	2%	99%		87%	64%	22%	1%			2	0	0								2
11-5	4%	97%		61%	33%	23%	4%	1%		2	1	0								4
10-6	7%	93%		27%	5%	12%	8%	2%		2	4	1	0							7
9-7	10%	86%		4%		1%	1%	1%		0	3	5	2	0	0					10
8-8	13%	76%									0	3	6	3	0					13
7-9	15%	62%										0	2	7	5	1	0			15
6-10	15%	47%											0	1	6	7	2	0		15
5-11	13%	32%												0	1	5	6	2		13
4-12	10%	18%													0	1	4	5		10
3-13	5%	9%														0	1	4		5
2-14	2%	3%															0	2		2
1-15	1%	1%																1		1
0-16	0%	0%																0		0
Total	100%			7%	4%	2%	1%	0%		7	9	10	10	11	12	13	13	14		100

Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.

			Offense																						Defense
			Tot Off		First Field Goal Attempt										Second Chance				TOs		Freethrows				Tot Def		First Field Goal Attempt										Second Chance				TOs		Freethrows
					Shot Accuracy				Shot Selection				Pts Per Shot														Shot Accuracy				Shot Selection				Pts Per Shot
					2 C	2 L	3	Tot	2 C	2 L	3	Tot			Off Reb	PPP	Tot				Att	Perc	Tot				2 C	2 L	3	Tot	2 C	2 L	3	Tot			Off Reb	PPP	Tot				Att	Perc	Tot
Season Ratings			F+		C+	D+	D-	D+	36%	37%	42%	C-	D+		F	D+	F+		D+		D	C	D-		D		D	D	D+	D-	40%	18%	42%	D+	D-		B-	D	C		C-		B-	F	C+
			0.97		57%	32%	29%	-3				0	0.91		21%	1.0	.20		19%		.26	72%	.19		1.15		60%	40%	34%	+4				+1	1.05		27%	1.1	.31		16%		.27	77%	.20
Nov 2	Syracuse	0.82	49%	23%	24%	-11	39%	23%	38%	0	0.76	20%	1.1	.21	21%	.24	66%	.16	1.20	66%	46%	38%	+10	44%	17%	39%	+1	1.18	29%	1.0	.35	14%	.29	71%	.21
			9-18	2-10	4-17							6 rb		7 pt	13 to			9-14		14-21	4-8	7-19							7 rb		9 pt	9 to			13-18
Nov 6	Rutgers	0.86	55%	27%	28%	-5	36%	22%	42%	0	0.87	20%	0.8	.15	21%	.22	67%	.15	1.19	61%	44%	37%	+7	37%	28%	35%	-1	1.08	30%	0.6	.39	13%	.31	81%	.25
			9-17	3-10	5-19							6 rb		5 pt	13 to			8-12		11-17	6-13	6-17							8 rb		10 pt	8 to			16-20
Nov 10	Army	1.02	63%	32%	31%	+1	38%	21%	41%	0	0.99	21%	1.2	.24	17%	.32	70%	.22	1.00	56%	20%	31%	-2	36%	7%	57%	+2	0.96	25%	0.8	.25	18%	.21	74%	.16
			11-17	3-10	6-19							6 rb		7 pt	11 to			13-19		10-17	1-3	8-27							8 rb		8 pt	11 to			10-13
Nov 15	Penn St.	0.88	56%	27%	31%	-3	34%	19%	47%	0	0.92	17%	1.1	.19	22%	.18	64%	.11	1.19	65%	50%	36%	+9	44%	16%	40%	+1	1.17	25%	1.0	.37	14%	.30	80%	.24
			9-16	2-9	7-22							5 rb		6 pt	14 to			6-10		14-21	4-7	7-19							6 rb		9 pt	9 to			15-19
Nov 21	New Hamp	1.00	61%	36%	30%	+1	42%	22%	37%	0	0.99	20%	1.0	.20	16%	.28	74%	.21	0.99	55%	35%	31%	-1	41%	11%	48%	+1	0.98	23%	0.8	.21	17%	.23	72%	.17
			12-20	4-10	5-17							6 rb		6 pt	10 to			12-17		11-19	2-5	7-23							7 rb		6 pt	11 to			10-14
Nov 24	Lindenwood	0.96	60%	30%	29%	-1	43%	20%	37%	0	0.95	22%	0.9	.21	19%	.29	69%	.20	1.02	57%	30%	29%	-2	47%	19%	34%	+1	0.94	28%	0.7	.34	18%	.27	70%	.19
			12-20	3-10	5-18							7 rb		6 pt	13 to			13-18		13-23	3-10	5-17							9 rb		10 pt	12 to			13-18
Dec 1	Delaware St.	0.98	67%	27%	27%	0	41%	17%	42%	+1	0.99	22%	1.1	.25	20%	.29	68%	.20	1.00	54%	40%	34%	+2	38%	33%	29%	-2	0.97	25%	0.9	.22	18%	.24	80%	.19
			12-18	2-7	5-18							6 rb		7 pt	12 to			11-17		9-17	6-15	5-13							7 rb		6 pt	11 to			11-14
Dec 4	Columbia	0.97	58%	36%	27%	-2	41%	24%	35%	0	0.94	19%	0.9	.17	16%	.27	72%	.19	1.07	57%	35%	37%	+4	46%	13%	41%	+2	1.07	32%	0.5	.33	20%	.23	74%	.17
			11-20	4-11	5-17							6 rb		5 pt	10 to			11-16		12-21	2-6	7-19							8 rb		9 pt	13 to			10-14
Dec 9	NJIT	1.01	59%	31%	29%	-1	40%	20%	41%	0	0.95	25%	1.0	.25	17%	.30	70%	.21	1.00	55%	41%	31%	0	35%	22%	44%	0	0.97	23%	1.1	.22	17%	.26	76%	.20
			11-18	3-9	6-19							7 rb		8 pt	11 to			13-19		9-16	4-10	6-21							7 rb		6 pt	11 to			12-16
Dec 18	Stony Brook	0.93	57%	27%	31%	-2	35%	20%	45%	0	0.92	20%	0.7	.15	19%	.26	66%	.17	1.11	56%	50%	37%	+5	36%	13%	51%	+1	1.10	26%	0.7	.26	16%	.22	81%	.17
			9-16	2-9	6-20							6 rb		5 pt	12 to			10-15		10-17	3-6	9-24							7 rb		7 pt	10 to			11-13
Dec 30	Nebraska	0.78	61%	29%	25%	-7	19%	28%	53%	-2	0.80	14%	0.7	.10	22%	.17	68%	.12	1.25	73%	41%	39%	+12	39%	9%	53%	+2	1.25	27%	0.6	.35	12%	.23	84%	.19
			5-9	4-13	6-24							5 rb		3 pt	14 to			6-9		14-19	2-4	10-26							7 rb		9 pt	8 to			12-14
Jan 2	Mercyhurst	1.00	61%	33%	30%	+1	43%	20%	37%	0	0.99	23%	1.0	.22	18%	.33	71%	.24	1.00	55%	45%	29%	+1	35%	31%	34%	-2	0.96	22%	1.1	.25	15%	.18	79%	.14
			11-18	3-9	5-16							6 rb		6 pt	11 to			14-19		9-17	7-15	5-16							6 rb		7 pt	9 to			8-11
Jan 4	LIU Brooklyn	0.97	56%	35%	29%	-2	44%	20%	37%	+1	0.95	25%	1.0	.25	20%	.29	68%	.19	1.03	58%	39%	33%	+2	46%	22%	31%	0	1.02	30%	0.9	.30	19%	.25	67%	.17
			11-20	3-9	5-17							7 rb		7 pt	13 to			12-17		12-21	4-10	5-14							8 rb		8 pt	13 to			10-15
Jan 8	Wagner	1.00	56%	34%	31%	-1	42%	18%	40%	+1	0.96	20%	1.0	.20	15%	.32	71%	.23	0.97	48%	37%	32%	-3	40%	20%	40%	0	0.92	27%	0.7	.30	19%	.24	73%	.17
			11-19	3-8	6-18							6 rb		6 pt	10 to			13-19		9-18	3-9	6-18							8 rb		9 pt	12 to			10-14
Jan 14	Central Conn	0.95	53%	29%	29%	-5	41%	15%	44%	+1	0.90	20%	0.9	.18	15%	.22	74%	.16	1.03	60%	39%	34%	+3	33%	30%	37%	-2	1.00	23%	0.9	.25	16%	.22	81%	.18
			10-19	2-7	6-21							6 rb		6 pt	10 to			10-13		9-15	5-14	6-18							6 rb		7 pt	10 to			10-13
Jan 16	Chicago St.	0.97	62%	23%	31%	-1	34%	13%	53%	+1	0.97	24%	1.0	.25	22%	.30	70%	.21	1.03	52%	40%	33%	0	35%	31%	34%	-2	0.95	26%	1.0	.28	15%	.22	81%	.18
			9-14	1-5	7-23							7 rb		7 pt	14 to			12-17		9-17	6-15	5-16							8 rb		8 pt	9 to			11-14
Jan 21	FDU	1.01	64%	35%	34%	+4	35%	20%	44%	0	1.04	17%	0.9	.15	17%	.29	69%	.20	0.99	57%	37%	28%	-2	35%	17%	48%	0	0.93	28%	0.4	.27	18%	.24	72%	.17
			10-16	3-9	7-20							5 rb		4 pt	11 to			11-16		9-15	3-8	6-22							8 rb		8 pt	11 to			10-14
Jan 23	LIU Brooklyn	0.93	54%	32%	28%	-4	44%	20%	37%	+1	0.90	23%	1.0	.23	20%	.29	65%	.19	1.07	60%	42%	35%	+5	46%	22%	31%	0	1.07	31%	0.9	.33	19%	.25	70%	.18
			11-20	3-9	5-16							7 rb		7 pt	13 to			11-17		13-22	4-10	5-14							8 rb		9 pt	12 to			11-15
Jan 27	Stonehill	0.97	55%	30%	30%	-3	41%	24%	35%	0	0.91	19%	1.0	.18	14%	.24	68%	.17	1.02	55%	45%	33%	+1	41%	15%	44%	+1	1.02	25%	0.8	.26	18%	.20	81%	.16
			11-20	3-11	5-17							6 rb		6 pt	9 to			10-15		11-19	3-7	7-21							7 rb		7 pt	11 to			9-12
Jan 30	Central Conn	1.00	55%	33%	30%	-2	41%	15%	44%	+1	0.95	22%	1.0	.21	15%	.22	77%	.17	0.98	57%	36%	32%	+1	33%	30%	37%	-2	0.95	22%	1.0	.22	17%	.22	78%	.17
			11-20	2-7	6-21							6 rb		6 pt	9 to			10-13		9-15	5-14	6-17							6 rb		6 pt	11 to			10-13
				Shot Accuracy				Shot Selection				PPS	2nd Chance			TOs	Freethrows				Shot Accuracy				Shot Selection				PPS	2nd Chance			TOs	Freethrows
Feb 3	Le Moyne	1.00	56%	25%	33%	-1	36%	19%	45%	0	0.94	21%	1.0	.22	16%	.27	73%	.20	1.02	60%	37%	33%	+2	42%	14%	45%	+1	1.04	21%	1.1	.23	19%	.29	74%	.22
			10-17	2-9	7-22							7 rb		7 pt	10 to			13-17		12-19	2-6	7-21							6 rb		6 pt	13 to			13-17
Feb 6	Wagner	0.95	53%	30%	30%	-4	42%	18%	40%	+1	0.91	19%	0.9	.17	16%	.32	68%	.22	1.02	50%	41%	34%	0	40%	20%	40%	0	0.97	28%	0.6	.33	18%	.24	76%	.18
			10-19	2-8	5-18							6 rb		5 pt	10 to			13-19		9-18	4-9	6-18							8 rb		9 pt	11 to			11-14
Feb 11	FDU	0.96	61%	32%	32%	+1	35%	20%	44%	0	0.99	16%	0.8	.12	18%	.29	66%	.19	1.04	60%	41%	30%	0	35%	17%	48%	0	0.99	29%	0.4	.29	17%	.24	76%	.18
			9-16	3-9	6-19							5 rb		3 pt	11 to			11-16		9-16	3-8	6-22							8 rb		8 pt	11 to			11-14
Feb 13	Chicago St.	1.02	65%	28%	32%	+2	34%	13%	53%	+1	1.02	25%	1.1	.28	21%	.30	73%	.22	0.98	50%	37%	31%	-2	35%	31%	34%	-2	0.89	25%	1.1	.25	15%	.22	78%	.17
			9-15	2-5	7-23							7 rb		7 pt	13 to			12-17		8-17	6-15	5-16							7 rb		8 pt	10 to			11-14
Feb 18	Le Moyne	0.96	53%	21%	32%	-4	36%	19%	45%	0	0.90	20%	1.0	.20	16%	.27	70%	.19	1.07	62%	41%	34%	+5	42%	14%	45%	+1	1.09	22%	1.1	.25	19%	.29	77%	.22
			9-17	2-9	7-22							7 rb		6 pt	11 to			12-17		12-19	3-6	7-21							6 rb		7 pt	12 to			13-18
Feb 20	Mercyhurst	0.96	59%	29%	28%	-2	43%	20%	37%	0	0.94	21%	0.9	.20	19%	.33	69%	.23	1.05	57%	47%	31%	+4	35%	31%	34%	-2	1.01	23%	1.0	.28	14%	.18	84%	.15
			11-18	3-9	4-16							6 rb		5 pt	12 to			13-19		10-17	7-15	5-16							6 rb		8 pt	9 to			9-11
Feb 25	Stonehill	1.01	57%	33%	32%	0	41%	24%	35%	0	0.96	20%	1.0	.21	13%	.24	72%	.17	0.97	53%	41%	31%	-1	41%	15%	44%	+1	0.96	24%	0.8	.23	19%	.20	77%	.15
			12-20	4-12	5-17							6 rb		6 pt	8 to			11-15		10-19	3-7	6-21							7 rb		7 pt	12 to			9-12