Pre-tourney Rankings
Illinois
Big Ten
2025-26
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for details.

Predictive Rating +21.8 7
Results Rating +19.4 16
Consistency 0.18 312
Pace 65.3 266
Improvement -1.2 228

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws		 Shot Selection
Offense A+ 2 B+ A+ A B B
Defense B+ 29 A A- F+ A+ A+

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 36% 246 A 68% 11 +2.4 92
2 Pt. Jumpers 19% 346 B- 41% 74 -2.9 317
Three Pointers 52% 15 B- 36% 96 +6.9 16
Shot Selection/Accuracy B +0.9 66 B+ +5.3 31
1st FG Attempt B+ 1.15 28
Second Chance A 41.6% 3 A 1.25 7 A+ 0.52 2
Opponents' Steals B 7.8% 38
Other Turnovers A+ 4.5% 1
Turnovers A 12.4% 8
Freethrows C+ 0.31 151 A- 79% 9 B 0.25 73
Total Offense A+ +15.0 2

Assists Opponents' Blocks
Close Shots C- 44% 248 B+ 7.8% 30
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots C- 23% 202 C+ 4.5% 152
Three Pointers D+ 79% 277 B+ 0.2% 32
Total C 56% 171 A- 3.5% 12


Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 27% 362 B+ 51% 29 -8.8 5
2 Pt. Jumpers 31% 5 B 34% 42 +2.9 353
Three Pointers 42% 139 B+ 31% 37 -1.6 114
Shot Selection/Accuracy A+ -2.2 3 A- -5.5 19
1st FG Attempt A 0.87 11
Second Chance A- 24.1% 13 B+ 0.90 22 A- 0.22 9
Turnovers from Steals F+ 6.6% 348
Other Turnovers D+ 6.5% 283
Turnovers F+ 13.1% 350
Freethrows A+ 0.17 1 B- 71% 79 A+ 0.12 1
Total Defense B+ +6.8 29

Assists Blocks
Close Shots A- 39% 21 B+ 15.8% 37
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots B 19% 59 A 9.8% 15
Three Pointers C+ 83% 149 B 1.6% 53
Total B 48% 40 B+ 8.0% 31

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 17.6 211 18.4 316
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.14 266 0.12 35
Consistency 0.11 73 0.13 251
Improvement +1.0 141 -2.1 291

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Selection Status Lock
Projected Seeding 3 seed  

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile 		Expected
50th Percentile 		Optimistic
95th Percentile
Predictive Rating Rank 7 7 7
Results Rating Rank 16 16 16
Conference Record 15 - 5 15 - 5 15 - 5
Conference Finish 2 2 2
NCAA Tourney Seed 5 3 2
NCAA Tourney Finish 2nd Round Sweet 16 Champ Game

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% n/a n/a
#1 Seed 2% n/a n/a
Top 2 Seed 26% n/a n/a
Top 4 Seed 91% n/a n/a
Top 6 Seed 100% n/a n/a
NCAA Tourney Bid 100% n/a n/a
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 100% n/a n/a
Average Seed 3.2 n/a n/a
.500 or above 0% n/a n/a
.500 or above in Conference 100% 100% 100.0%
Conference Champion 0% 0% 0.0%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0.0%
First Four0% n/a n/a
First Round100% n/a n/a
Second Round97% n/a n/a
Sweet Sixteen70% n/a n/a
Elite Eight38% n/a n/a
Final Four18% n/a n/a
Championship Game9% n/a n/a
National Champion4% n/a n/a

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a5 - 75 - 7
Quad 1b2 - 17 - 8
Quad 25 - 012 - 8
Quad 37 - 019 - 8
Quad 45 - 024 - 8


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs
 Mon, Nov 3 346 Jackson St. W 113 - 55 100% +33  97% 1 - 0 A+ +42 A+ +20 A+ A+ C A+ +17 A- A+ F+
 Fri, Nov 7 255 Florida Gulf Coast W 113 - 70 99% +31  99% 2 - 0 A+ +35 A+ +26 A+ A+ A+ B+ +5 A+ A+ F
 Tue, Nov 11 19 Texas Tech W 81 - 77 73% +4  84% 3 - 0 A +19 B+ +9 A- A+ D+ A +10 B- A+ B+
 Fri, Nov 14 256 Colgate W 84 - 65 99% +11  95% 4 - 0 B +11 B +7 F A+ A- B +5 B+ A- F
 Wed, Nov 19 17 Alabama L 86 - 90 63% -1  53% 4 - 1 B+ +14 B- +6 A- A- C+ A +9 B C+ C+
 Sat, Nov 22 223 LIU Brooklyn W 98 - 58 99% +26  93% 5 - 1 A+ +34 A+ +19 A+ A+ B- A+ +14 B A+ A-
 Mon, Nov 24 134 UT Rio Grande Valley W 87 - 73 97% +8  80% 6 - 1 B+ +13 A- +11 A- B C+ C+ +1 A- C F
 Fri, Nov 28 9 Connecticut L 61 - 74 58% -10  0% 6 - 2 B- +7 C- -1 D C- A B+ +7 B A+ C-
 Sat, Dec 6 18 Tennessee W 75 - 62 63% +4  80% 7 - 2 A+ +31 A+ +20 A+ A+ A+ A+ +13 A+ C- A
 Tue, Dec 9 24 @Ohio St. W 88 - 80 60% +4  87% 8 - 2 1 - 0 A+ +27 A+ +20 A+ C- A A- +7 A+ C F
 Sat, Dec 13 16 Nebraska L 80 - 83 73% -6  1% 8 - 3 1 - 1 B+ +12 A+ +24 A+ A+ A+ F -11 C- C F+
 Mon, Dec 22 49 Missouri W 91 - 48 83% +17  91% 9 - 3 A+ +55 A+ +31 B+ A+ C A+ +29 A+ A+ D+
 Mon, Dec 29 278 Southern W 90 - 55 99% +20  99% 10 - 3 A+ +25 A+ +17 A+ A+ F+ A +11 A+ C F+
 Sat, Jan 3 123 @Penn St. W 73 - 65 93% +10  99% 11 - 3 2 - 1 B+ +14 C +1 F C A A+ +13 A+ C+ F
 Thu, Jan 8 101 Rutgers W 81 - 55 96% +17  95% 12 - 3 3 - 1 A+ +28 A +14 A+ F A+ A+ +16 A+ A+ D-
 Sun, Jan 11 27 @Iowa W 75 - 69 62% +10  99% 13 - 3 4 - 1 A+ +25 A +12 B+ C+ A A+ +13 A+ A D
 Wed, Jan 14 57 @Northwestern W 79 - 68 80% +5  82% 14 - 3 5 - 1 A+ +24 A+ +23 A A+ A+ B- +3 A+ F C-
 Sat, Jan 17 68 Minnesota W 77 - 67 92% +2  55% 15 - 3 6 - 1 A- +16 A +15 B A+ B B- +3 A F F
 Wed, Jan 21 104 Maryland W 89 - 70 96% +12  76% 16 - 3 7 - 1 A +21 A+ +17 B- A+ A+ B +4 A- B F
 Sat, Jan 24 8 @Purdue W 88 - 82 41% -3  22% 17 - 3 8 - 1 A+ +30 A+ +29 A+ A+ B- C+ +2 D A+ F
 Thu, Jan 29 50 Washington W 75 - 66 89% +5  85% 18 - 3 9 - 1 A- +17 A +14 C- A+ A+ B +5 D+ A+ B-
 Sun, Feb 1 16 @Nebraska W 78 - 69 51% +2  51% 19 - 3 10 - 1 A+ +30 A+ +24 A+ B+ A+ A- +7 B- B+ C-
 Wed, Feb 4 57 Northwestern W 84 - 44 91% +26  91% 20 - 3 11 - 1 A+ +47 A+ +20 A+ A+ B- A+ +31 A+ A+ F
 Sat, Feb 7 10 @Michigan St. L 82 - 85 OT 47% +2  63% 20 - 4 11 - 2 A +20 A+ +16 C B+ A+ B- +3 B A+ F
 Tue, Feb 10 22 Wisconsin L 90 - 92 OT 77% +2  54% 20 - 5 11 - 3 B+ +12 A +14 A+ A- D+ C- -2 C+ A F
 Sun, Feb 15 44 Indiana W 71 - 51 87% +9  87% 21 - 5 12 - 3 A+ +30 A+ +15 B- A+ A+ A+ +19 A+ A+ B-
 Wed, Feb 18 75 @USC W 101 - 65 84% +21  98% 22 - 5 13 - 3 A+ +47 A+ +30 A+ A+ A A+ +16 A+ B+ B+
 Sat, Feb 21 26 @UCLA L 94 - 95 OT 62% +5  63% 22 - 6 13 - 4 A- +18 A+ +22 C+ A+ A+ D+ -4 D- A+ F
 Fri, Feb 27 3 Michigan L 70 - 84 46% -7  17% 22 - 7 13 - 5 B +9 A- +11 B- A+ B C- -2 A- F C
 Tue, Mar 3 86 Oregon W 80 - 54 94% +15  84% 23 - 7 14 - 5 A+ +30 B+ +9 C+ C A+ A+ +21 A+ A+ F
 Sun, Mar 8 104 @Maryland W 78 - 72 90% +2  62% 24 - 7 15 - 5 B+ +14 A+ +18 C- A+ A D+ -3 F A+ F
 Fri, Mar 13 22 Wisconsin L 88 - 91 OT 68% +4  68% 24 - 8 B+ +14 A- +11 A B A+ B- +3 A B- D
Totals 24 - 8 15 - 5 +22 A+ +15 A+ B+ B B+ +7 B- A- B



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings A+ A B- B- B+ 36% 19% 52% B B+ A A A+ A C+ A- B B+ B+ B B+ A- 27% 31% 42% A+ A A- B+ A- F+ A+ B- A+
1.30 68% 41% 36% +5 +1 1.15 42% 1.2 .52 12% .31 79% .25 0.99 51% 34% 31% -5 -2 0.87 24% 0.9 .22 13% .17 71% .22
Nov
3		 Jackson St. A+ D B A+ A+ 32% 9% 59% C+ A+ A+ A A+ C B- F C- A+ F+ A A B 13% 42% 45% A+ A- A+ A+ A+ F+ A- B A-
1.50 56% 40% 52% +15 +1 1.34 58% 1.2 .72 16% .38 67% .25 0.73 63% 28% 26% -9 -4 0.75 9% 0.3 .02 15% .22 71% .15
Nov
7		 Florida Gulf Coast A+ A+ B- B A+ 38% 13% 49% B- A+ A A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ B+ B A B- A- 20% 45% 35% A+ A+ B+ A+ A+ F A F B
1.51 86% 43% 37% +13 +1 1.31 39% 1.5 .61 9% .50 88% .44 0.93 54% 30% 30% -6 -5 0.80 25% 0.5 .13 1% .16 92% .15
Nov
11		 Texas Tech B+ A- A D B+ 35% 25% 40% B+ A- B+ A+ A+ D+ A+ B- A+ A F F A+ C 29% 34% 37% A+ B- A+ A A+ B+ A+ D+ A+
1.13 67% 46% 29% +2 -1 1.04 32% 1.3 .41 18% .39 70% .27 1.07 82% 55% 27% +9 -2 1.15 23% 0.9 .20 18% .07 75% .05
Nov
14		 Colgate B C+ F F F 25% 15% 60% D+ F A+ B+ A+ A- A A+ A+ B F C+ A C+ 19% 49% 32% A+ B+ A+ C- A- F A+ F A
1.26 62% 25% 28% -6 0 0.89 45% 1.2 .52 10% .40 88% .35 0.97 73% 39% 28% 0 -5 0.93 17% 1.0 .17 7% .15 89% .13
Nov
19		 Alabama B- A F B+ B+ 37% 18% 45% B+ A- B+ A- A- C+ A F B- A D+ B+ D+ B- 26% 19% 56% A+ B A F C+ C+ C B C+
1.09 64% 18% 37% 0 0 1.03 33% 1.1 .38 14% .33 59% .19 1.14 64% 40% 37% +4 -1 1.09 28% 1.4 .39 13% .33 74% .25
Nov
22		 LIU Brooklyn A+ A+ A+ D A+ 55% 22% 24% C A+ A+ A+ A+ B- F B D- A+ A+ D D B- 28% 30% 42% A B A A+ A+ A- A+ A+ A+
1.38 77% 58% 31% +13 +1 1.31 50% 1.3 .65 17% .25 73% .19 0.81 40% 44% 36% -2 -2 0.94 25% 0.6 .14 24% .13 57% .07
Nov
24		 UT Rio Grande Valley A- A+ D F A- 34% 11% 55% B A- C A- B C+ B- A+ A C+ A- A+ F B 28% 34% 38% A+ A- B- D+ C F C- A+ A-
1.24 94% 33% 28% +7 +1 1.17 32% 1.0 .32 16% .37 86% .32 1.04 50% 20% 45% -2 -3 0.93 24% 1.1 .27 6% .24 50% .12
Nov
28		 Connecticut C- D- A+ F F 44% 8% 48% A+ D B F C- A C A+ A B+ B+ F C B 35% 15% 50% B- B B- A+ A+ C- C B- C
0.92 43% 50% 20% -16 +2 0.75 31% 0.7 .21 15% .32 94% .30 1.12 56% 63% 35% +3 0 1.10 36% 0.8 .28 15% .30 71% .21
Dec
6		 Tennessee A+ B- D+ B A- 48% 6% 46% A+ A+ A- A+ A+ A+ D F D- A+ A+ A+ B A+ 45% 21% 34% C A+ F B C- A C- A+ A+
1.22 58% 33% 35% 0 +3 1.08 32% 1.4 .44 10% .25 57% .14 1.01 43% 10% 31% -14 0 0.74 53% 1.0 .51 21% .37 44% .16
Dec
9		 Ohio St. A+ C- B- A+ A+ 23% 26% 51% C A+ C+ D C- A A+ A+ A+ A- D+ C+ A- A+ 24% 26% 50% B+ A+ A+ F C F B B+ B+
1.26 55% 42% 46% +9 -2 1.17 28% 0.9 .25 13% .53 91% .48 1.15 69% 43% 30% +1 -2 1.00 20% 1.9 .37 9% .33 71% .24
Dec
13		 Nebraska A+ A+ A+ D- A+ 26% 21% 53% B A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ C A+ F F+ D+ F D- 27% 29% 45% A+ C- C D+ C F+ A+ F A+
1.27 83% 50% 28% +4 -1 1.09 41% 1.5 .59 13% .36 70% .25 1.31 73% 38% 44% +11 -2 1.20 28% 1.1 .31 10% .14 88% .12
Dec
22		 Missouri A+ B+ C- A- A- 18% 25% 57% D B+ A+ A+ A+ C A+ A A+ A+ A+ A+ B A+ 28% 32% 40% A+ A+ A- A+ A+ D+ A B- A
1.46 63% 36% 40% +6 -2 1.09 56% 1.9 1.07 18% .39 80% .31 0.77 38% 20% 32% -13 -2 0.72 30% 0.4 .13 16% .29 67% .19
Dec
29		 Southern A+ A+ F A+ A+ 30% 11% 59% B- A+ A+ C A+ F+ C A+ B+ A B- A+ A+ A+ 31% 44% 25% A+ A+ C- B- C F+ A+ F+ A+
1.39 93% 20% 44% +18 +1 1.39 55% 1.1 .62 22% .36 89% .32 0.85 53% 21% 21% -14 -3 0.67 31% 1.0 .31 12% .14 75% .11
Jan
3		 Penn St. C B- F F F 33% 16% 51% C F A- F C A A+ A A+ A+ A+ B- A+ A+ 28% 14% 58% B- A+ C- B C+ F A+ A+ A+
1.08 63% 25% 24% -8 0 0.86 36% 0.9 .33 15% .49 82% .40 0.96 44% 38% 24% -13 0 0.77 29% 1.1 .33 10% .23 64% .15
Jan
8		 Rutgers A C+ A+ B+ A+ 31% 16% 53% C A+ B- F F A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ C+ B- A 18% 48% 34% A+ A+ A+ B+ A+ D- A+ A+ A+
1.26 60% 75% 38% +10 0 1.22 34% 0.3 .11 11% .37 86% .31 0.85 30% 37% 32% -7 -5 0.79 21% 1.0 .21 11% .14 38% .05
Jan
11		 Iowa A B+ F C B 46% 8% 46% A B+ B D+ C+ A F A+ F A+ D+ A+ B+ A+ 32% 21% 46% A A+ A A- A D A+ F A+
1.14 67% 25% 33% +3 +2 1.12 30% 0.9 .27 18% .20 82% .17 1.04 67% 25% 31% -2 -1 0.96 26% 0.9 .23 12% .10 100% .10
Jan
14		 Northwestern A+ C- A+ A A 27% 16% 57% C+ A A+ A+ A+ A+ F A+ D- B- A+ B+ B- A+ 21% 28% 51% A A+ F F F C- C+ F D
1.33 54% 50% 39% +5 0 1.12 45% 1.4 .61 13% .16 100% .16 1.14 11% 33% 32% -13 -2 0.72 41% 1.7 .69 12% .32 88% .29
Jan
17		 Minnesota A C+ A+ C+ B+ 22% 22% 57% C- B A+ B- A+ B A+ A+ A+ B- F A+ B- A- 19% 30% 52% A+ A D+ F F F A+ F A+
1.25 60% 50% 35% +4 -1 1.07 46% 0.9 .43 16% .37 84% .31 1.09 80% 25% 32% -1 -3 0.94 31% 1.4 .42 11% .05 100% .05
Jan
21		 Maryland A+ C- A+ C+ B 17% 19% 64% D- B- A+ A A+ A+ A+ C+ A+ B F B A B- 15% 36% 49% A+ A- A+ F B F A A+ A+
1.31 56% 50% 35% +3 -1 1.06 41% 1.2 .49 10% .46 71% .33 1.03 78% 33% 28% -3 -4 0.88 22% 1.4 .32 7% .25 50% .13
Jan
24		 Purdue A+ F A+ A+ A+ 17% 12% 71% B+ A+ A+ A+ A+ B- A+ B+ A+ C+ F F F+ F+ 33% 36% 31% A+ D A+ A+ A+ F A+ F A
1.39 29% 60% 50% +15 0 1.31 45% 1.4 .62 16% .41 73% .30 1.29 78% 55% 41% +16 -2 1.29 13% 0.7 .09 5% .18 82% .15
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Jan
29		 Washington A D+ A+ F D- 38% 10% 52% A+ C- A+ A+ A+ A+ B F+ C+ B F F C+ F+ 21% 40% 38% A+ D+ C+ A+ A+ B- A+ F A
1.23 53% 60% 23% -8 +1 0.88 38% 1.7 .65 8% .28 63% .18 1.08 80% 53% 33% +10 -4 1.15 35% 0.4 .13 16% .16 100% .16
Feb
1		 Nebraska A+ A+ F+ D+ A 29% 15% 56% A A+ A C+ B+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A- A+ A- F C+ 21% 21% 58% A+ B- A+ F B+ C- A+ D- A+
1.23 86% 29% 30% +3 0 1.08 34% 0.9 .31 13% .47 81% .38 1.09 45% 27% 45% +5 -1 1.09 17% 1.3 .23 13% .09 80% .07
Feb
4		 Northwestern A+ A+ F A+ A+ 21% 8% 71% B- A+ B+ A+ A+ B- C- A- C+ A+ A+ B- A+ A+ 22% 37% 41% A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ F A+ A+ A+
1.33 70% 25% 44% +12 0 1.27 39% 1.3 .50 17% .27 79% .21 0.70 46% 36% 17% -14 -3 0.68 13% 0.3 .04 2% .06 50% .03
Feb
7		 Michigan St. A+ C+ F D C- 30% 16% 54% B C A+ C+ B+ A+ A+ A+ A+ B- C- D C C+ 29% 41% 30% A+ B C+ A+ A+ F C F D-
1.15 56% 20% 30% -7 0 0.89 31% 0.8 .25 6% .36 83% .30 1.19 63% 43% 35% +4 -3 1.04 39% 0.8 .32 11% .36 87% .32
Feb
10		 Wisconsin A A+ D- A+ A+ 25% 16% 58% B- A+ B- A+ A- D+ A- F C+ C- C- A+ F C- 29% 21% 50% A+ C+ C A+ A F A+ A- A+
1.23 79% 33% 44% +13 0 1.27 28% 1.3 .34 18% .31 58% .18 1.25 63% 21% 45% +7 -1 1.14 32% 0.9 .27 5% .20 71% .14
Feb
15		 Indiana A+ A+ C F C+ 34% 15% 51% A- B- A+ B- A+ A+ F A+ F A+ C C- A+ A+ 24% 29% 47% A+ A+ A+ D- A+ B- A+ F+ A+
1.25 67% 38% 26% -3 0 0.96 42% 1.1 .47 4% .13 86% .11 0.90 64% 46% 24% -3 -2 0.91 15% 1.3 .19 16% .13 83% .11
Feb
18		 USC A+ B+ C A+ A+ 48% 10% 42% A A+ A+ A+ A+ A A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A F A+ 39% 31% 30% B+ A+ B B+ B+ B+ B+ A+ A+
1.41 63% 40% 48% +11 +2 1.28 43% 1.3 .57 13% .42 92% .38 0.91 33% 29% 44% -8 -1 0.83 32% 0.9 .29 20% .35 60% .21
Feb
21		 UCLA A+ A+ F D- C 30% 7% 63% A- C+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A A+ D+ C F F D 39% 20% 41% F+ D- A A- A+ F B F C+
1.29 71% 0% 29% -4 +1 0.96 51% 1.4 .69 12% .49 81% .39 1.30 61% 50% 46% +11 0 1.24 26% 1.0 .26 7% .28 84% .24
Feb
27		 Michigan A- D C- D+ B- 18% 29% 53% D+ B- A A+ A+ B C B- C+ C- C- C- C+ B+ 34% 24% 42% A+ A- C+ F F C A- F B-
1.05 44% 33% 30% -7 -3 0.82 34% 1.7 .57 15% .21 75% .16 1.27 65% 42% 33% +3 -1 1.06 38% 2.0 .76 15% .30 82% .25
Mar
3		 Oregon B+ B C F+ C- 38% 8% 53% A+ C+ B D C A+ D+ A+ C A+ B- B+ A+ A+ 27% 27% 46% A+ A+ A+ A- A+ F A+ D A+
1.17 61% 40% 28% -3 +2 0.98 34% 0.8 .27 9% .22 86% .19 0.79 53% 33% 15% -15 -2 0.68 21% 1.0 .21 12% .15 78% .12
Mar
8		 Maryland A+ A+ F F D+ 41% 15% 43% B- C- A+ A+ A+ A A+ A+ A+ D+ F F C F 21% 29% 50% A+ F B- A+ A+ F A- C- B+
1.27 79% 14% 20% -4 +1 0.96 39% 1.6 .61 11% .48 81% .39 1.18 70% 64% 33% +10 -2 1.17 34% 0.5 .19 13% .28 73% .21
Mar
13		 Wisconsin A- A+ C D+ A- 39% 16% 45% A- A C+ A+ B A+ D+ F D- B- F+ F A+ A 30% 7% 63% C A B- C B- D F D- F
1.16 72% 40% 31% +4 +1 1.11 26% 1.2 .31 9% .22 60% .13 1.20 71% 75% 25% -2 +1 1.00 29% 1.2 .34 9% .44 83% .36



Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.



Projected Big Ten Finish

0-20 1-19 2-18 3-17 4-16 5-15 6-14 7-13 8-12 9-11 10-10 11-9 12-8 13-7 14-6 15-5 16-4 17-3 18-2 19-1 20-0 Total
1st 1st
2nd 100.0 100.0 2nd
3rd 3rd
4th 4th
5th 5th
6th 6th
7th 7th
8th 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 11th
12th 12th
13th 13th
14th 14th
15th 15th
16th 16th
17th 17th
18th 18th
Total 100.0 Total



Big Ten Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
20-0
19-1
18-2
17-3
16-4
15-5 0.0%
14-6
13-7
12-8
11-9
10-10
Total



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid		AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
20-0
19-1
18-2
17-3
16-4
15-5 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3.2 2.5 23.1 34.5 30.6 8.8 0.5 100.0%
14-6
13-7
12-8
11-9
10-10
9-11
8-12
7-13
6-14
5-15
4-16
3-17
2-18
1-19
0-20
Total 100% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 3.2 100.0%