Charlotte
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
621  Tom Nobles FR 33:12
689  Ben Sterett SR 33:20
810  Michael Tamayo SR 33:30
827  Daniel Beamer SO 33:32
1,297  Nick Rotz SR 34:13
1,415  Zach Greth SR 34:22
1,692  Adam Huff FR 34:49
1,940  Josh Barrett FR 35:15
1,954  Carl Walton Jr. JR 35:16
2,748  Kent Mann SO 37:52
National Rank #133 of 308
Southeast Region Rank #18 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.1%
Top 20 in Regional 96.8%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Tom Nobles Ben Sterett Michael Tamayo Daniel Beamer Nick Rotz Zach Greth Adam Huff Josh Barrett Carl Walton Jr. Kent Mann
Charlotte Invitational 09/25 1134 33:03 33:18 33:44 33:33 34:01 34:30 37:28 36:02 35:31 37:38
Wake Forest Invitational 10/16 1113 33:10 33:06 33:16 33:23 34:07 34:28 34:51 35:16 35:49 38:01
Conference USA Championships 10/31 1163 33:37 33:42 33:24 33:27 34:35 34:34 34:45 34:58 34:29
Southeast Region Championships 11/13 1169 33:11 33:52 33:56 34:00 34:15 35:18





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 17.2 494 0.1 0.4 1.4 2.6 5.0 7.9 13.0 19.3 24.8 15.6 6.6 2.6 0.5 0.0 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Tom Nobles 75.8
Ben Sterett 84.0
Michael Tamayo 94.1
Daniel Beamer 96.0
Nick Rotz 134.8
Zach Greth 144.3
Adam Huff 168.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 0.1% 0.1 10
11 0.4% 0.4 11
12 1.4% 1.4 12
13 2.6% 2.6 13
14 5.0% 5.0 14
15 7.9% 7.9 15
16 13.0% 13.0 16
17 19.3% 19.3 17
18 24.8% 24.8 18
19 15.6% 15.6 19
20 6.6% 6.6 20
21 2.6% 2.6 21
22 0.5% 0.5 22
23 0.0% 0.0 23
24 0.0% 0.0 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0