Citadel
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,738  Michael Lantz SO 34:53
1,766  Ross Jordan JR 34:55
2,168  James Cunningham SO 35:41
2,406  Matthew Gill JR 36:19
2,529  Grant Smith JR 36:43
2,724  Charles Braddock SO 37:43
2,746  James Howlin SO 37:52
2,780  Taggert Solomon FR 38:07
2,786  William Sloane SR 38:08
2,941  Michael Darley JR 39:47
National Rank #248 of 308
Southeast Region Rank #35 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 36th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Michael Lantz Ross Jordan James Cunningham Matthew Gill Grant Smith Charles Braddock James Howlin Taggert Solomon William Sloane Michael Darley
Will Wilson Invitational 09/26 1347 34:33 35:00 36:12 35:47 36:58 41:44 37:13 37:58 37:52 41:39
Upstate Invitational 10/03 1370 34:48 33:55 36:05 37:51 36:48 38:13 38:04 39:56
College of Charleston Classic Invitational 10/16 1381 34:56 35:22 35:49 36:54 37:12 37:47 38:18 37:25 39:18
Southern Conference Championship 10/31 1361 35:08 36:04 35:27 36:18 36:13 37:34 37:53 38:05





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 35.2 1033 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Michael Lantz 171.5
Ross Jordan 173.3
James Cunningham 203.3
Matthew Gill 230.5
Grant Smith 246.7
Charles Braddock 270.2
James Howlin 272.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 0.1% 0.1 28
29 0.2% 0.2 29
30 0.4% 0.4 30
31 1.2% 1.2 31
32 2.6% 2.6 32
33 6.4% 6.4 33
34 16.8% 16.8 34
35 26.2% 26.2 35
36 26.4% 26.4 36
37 16.8% 16.8 37
38 2.9% 2.9 38
39 0.0% 0.0 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0