Gonzaga
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
144  Troy Fraley JR 32:01
217  Matthew Crichlow SR 32:20
299  Kyle Branch SR 32:33
385  Vince Hamilton SR 32:46
539  Scott Kopczynski FR 33:03
562  Jack Pearce FR 33:06
608  Max Kaderabek SO 33:10
660  Ian Goldizen JR 33:16
783  Conor McCandless JR 33:28
837  Andy Thomas SR 33:33
900  Forest Tarbath JR 33:39
1,132  Danny Lunder JR 33:58
1,464  Kellen Manley FR 34:27
1,668  William Thompson FR 34:47
1,788  Benjamin Stout JR 34:58
1,937  Henry Morris JR 35:15
1,993  Coby Eastwood FR 35:19
2,213  Kinsly Smith SO 35:48
National Rank #57 of 308
West Region Rank #11 of 32
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.1%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.6%
Top 10 in Regional 54.1%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Troy Fraley Matthew Crichlow Kyle Branch Vince Hamilton Scott Kopczynski Jack Pearce Max Kaderabek Ian Goldizen Conor McCandless Andy Thomas Forest Tarbath
Washington Invitational 10/02 814 31:58 32:33 32:23 32:44 32:45 33:31 33:10 33:26 33:40
Inland Empire Championships 10/17 927 32:29 32:31 32:47 33:09 33:03 32:53 33:11 33:15 32:51 33:16 33:39
West Coast Conference 10/31 855 32:00 32:30 32:42 32:36 33:34 33:03 33:29 33:31 34:16
West Region Championships 11/13 729 31:52 31:42 32:23 32:41 33:04 33:17 34:11
NCAA Championship 11/21 32:09





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.1% 23.6 543 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Region Championship 100% 10.2 274 0.2 0.5 1.2 2.9 6.9 15.5 26.9 25.5 17.8 2.5 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Troy Fraley 20.3% 102.5
Matthew Crichlow 1.9% 134.5
Kyle Branch 0.2% 120.5
Vince Hamilton 0.1% 150.5
Scott Kopczynski 0.1% 197.5
Jack Pearce 0.1% 209.5
Max Kaderabek 0.1% 223.3


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Troy Fraley 27.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.7 2.6 3.3 3.5 3.8 2.9 3.4 2.8 2.7 3.6 2.9
Matthew Crichlow 42.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.3 1.4
Kyle Branch 54.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Vince Hamilton 65.9 0.0 0.0
Scott Kopczynski 82.7
Jack Pearce 84.6
Max Kaderabek 89.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 0.2% 37.5% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 4
5 0.5% 8.3% 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 5
6 1.2% 1.7% 0.0 1.2 0.0 6
7 2.9% 0.7% 0.0 2.9 0.0 7
8 6.9% 6.9 8
9 15.5% 15.5 9
10 26.9% 26.9 10
11 25.5% 25.5 11
12 17.8% 17.8 12
13 2.5% 2.5 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
Total 100% 0.1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 99.9 0.0 0.1




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
San Francisco 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0