Hartford
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,416  Christopher Helminski SR 34:22
1,727  Willy Pierce FR 34:52
1,903  Charles Davis SR 35:11
1,981  Kyle Hamel SR 35:18
2,034  Rourk Marlow JR 35:24
2,216  Evan Jaworski SO 35:48
2,415  Nick Ackley FR 36:21
2,604  Aedan Hale SO 37:01
2,608  Tim Fitzgerald FR 37:03
2,851  Zach Drown SO 38:53
National Rank #223 of 308
Northeast Region Rank #32 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 35th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Christopher Helminski Willy Pierce Charles Davis Kyle Hamel Rourk Marlow Evan Jaworski Nick Ackley Aedan Hale Tim Fitzgerald Zach Drown
CCSU Ted Owen Invitational 09/26 1346 35:29 35:13 35:10 36:03 36:31 36:33 38:55
NEICAAA Championship 10/10 1289 34:00 34:56 35:04 35:36 35:53 36:41
America East Championships 10/31 1287 35:05 34:47 35:11 35:11 35:17 35:27 36:30 38:17 37:24 38:50
Northeast Region Championships 11/13 1308 34:16 34:33 36:10 35:38 35:54 36:13





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 34.1 1020 0.1 0.3 1.0 3.6



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Christopher Helminski 157.8
Willy Pierce 195.5
Charles Davis 215.9
Kyle Hamel 222.3
Rourk Marlow 226.7
Evan Jaworski 241.5
Nick Ackley 256.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 0.1% 0.1 28
29 0.3% 0.3 29
30 1.0% 1.0 30
31 3.6% 3.6 31
32 12.6% 12.6 32
33 18.7% 18.7 33
34 21.2% 21.2 34
35 22.0% 22.0 35
36 15.3% 15.3 36
37 3.6% 3.6 37
38 1.4% 1.4 38
39 0.2% 0.2 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0