IPFW
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
2,026  Bret Unger SO 35:23
2,317  Logan Kitchens FR 36:06
2,449  Gabe O'Keefe SO 36:26
2,492  Randy McComb SR 36:35
2,524  Connor Schaffer FR 36:42
2,778  Nathan Clary FR 38:06
2,814  Ryan Curtis JR 38:25
2,936  Kurt Unger SO 39:46
National Rank #263 of 308
Great Lakes Region Rank #29 of 31
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 30th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Bret Unger Logan Kitchens Gabe O'Keefe Randy McComb Connor Schaffer Nathan Clary Ryan Curtis Kurt Unger
Greater Louisville Classic (Silver) 10/03 1435 35:45 36:09 36:57 36:49 37:13 38:15 38:18
University of Evansville Invitational 10/17 1373 35:32 35:15 35:39 36:42 36:43 38:23 38:31 42:31
Summit League Championships 10/31 1412 35:28 37:47 35:39 36:38 36:17 38:06 37:44 38:51
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/13 1404 34:59 35:46 37:30 36:18 36:49 37:52 39:34





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 29.5 963 0.1 2.5 43.7 53.7



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Bret Unger 178.6
Logan Kitchens 191.3
Gabe O'Keefe 195.3
Randy McComb 197.0
Connor Schaffer 198.0
Nathan Clary 209.2
Ryan Curtis 210.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 2.5% 2.5 28
29 43.7% 43.7 29
30 53.7% 53.7 30
31 31
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0