Rutgers
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
821  Conor Murphy FR 33:31
935  Jaimin Vekaria SR 33:41
978  Luke Wiley SO 33:45
1,045  Trent Brinkofski SO 33:51
1,386  Dominick Munson FR 34:20
1,488  Nick Price JR 34:29
1,568  Anthony Horten SR 34:37
2,412  Kian Jackson FR 36:20
National Rank #165 of 308
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #16 of 32
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 16th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 5.1%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Conor Murphy Jaimin Vekaria Luke Wiley Trent Brinkofski Dominick Munson Nick Price Anthony Horten Kian Jackson
Metropolitan Championship 10/09 1197 33:58 33:47 34:38 33:37 34:33 35:06 34:52 36:10
Princeton Invitational 10/17 1178 34:09 33:42 33:36 33:57 34:18 34:03 34:43 36:25
Big Ten Championships 11/01 1140 32:58 33:41 33:14 34:12 34:22 34:43 36:33
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/13 1157 33:14 33:34 33:51 33:45 34:09 34:11





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 14.8 415 0.1 0.5 1.7 2.9 5.3 6.7 11.1 13.4 15.3 16.6 13.9 9.6 2.8 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Conor Murphy 64.3
Jaimin Vekaria 73.4
Luke Wiley 77.2
Trent Brinkofski 83.0
Dominick Munson 109.6
Nick Price 118.4
Anthony Horten 124.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 0.1% 0.1 7
8 0.5% 0.5 8
9 1.7% 1.7 9
10 2.9% 2.9 10
11 5.3% 5.3 11
12 6.7% 6.7 12
13 11.1% 11.1 13
14 13.4% 13.4 14
15 15.3% 15.3 15
16 16.6% 16.6 16
17 13.9% 13.9 17
18 9.6% 9.6 18
19 2.8% 2.8 19
20 0.1% 0.1 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0